Ok, thanks.
2006/10/17, Zach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Samba is a client to slapd, so it needs a properly configured ldap.conf.
On 10/9/06, Net Warrior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks I'll try that.
> I did not modify ldap.conf, cause I thought that ldap.conf is a client
> setting and not a
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Paul Coray wrote:
> No, I never used SASL, since I want TLS for LDAP transport ;-).
Please test if the custom libldap2 package I'll sent to you in separate
mail (don't want to flood the lists) work better.
Greetings
Torsten
signatu
> Anyway, if you have those packages from the Debian openldap2 sources
> handy, I would gladly test them.
I just built them. I don't think it will help though. Looking at the
source I wonder why it doesn't fail consistently. So I have to ask you
another question: Are you using that SASL stuff? (
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:29:22PM +0100, Paul Coray wrote:
> Sorry, as the Packages file at ftp://ftp.uni-marburg.de/linux/debian
> mentions your name as maintainer, I thought you made those, but I'm glad
> you are willing to deal with them anyway :-)
They are not making the proble
Torsten,
Thanks for your quick response!
>
> Package: slapd
> Version: 2.2.20-1.hrz.1
>
> Package: libldap2.2
> Version: 2.2.20-1.hrz.1
>
> Package: ldap-utils
> Version: 2.2.20-1.hrz.1
Where are those available? I did not know about that fork and perhaps I
can share some work with the mai
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:30:35AM +0100, Paul Coray wrote:
> Three days ago I switched our domain from a NT 4 domaincontroller to
> Samba-OpenLDAP, controlled by a Debian Sarge system. I installed the
> following inofficial Debian OpenLDAP 2.2 packages (I know these are not
> support
"Peter Nyberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everything seams to work on the ldap server and when I do
a ldapsearch like this:
ldapsearch -H ldap://l1.dbb.su.se/ -b dc=dbb,dc=su,dc=se -x
Everything works on both.
But when I do:
ldapsearch -H ldaps://l1.dbb.su.se/ -b d
Sorry if I'm misleading due to lack of experience, but a self-signed
certificate would not be likely to be accepted unless you configured the
client to accept exactly that certificate. The reason other professional
certificates work is because they are signed by a know authority, who is
already
