Re: [Samba] Re: Security Hell

2004-08-04 Thread Darren Martz
Correction. 1) Anonymous browsing now works with readonly on each share. 2) Private shares require authorization, but only grant readonly access?? -- Original Message -- From: "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:27:30 -0700 Darren Mart

Re: [Samba] Re: Security Hell

2004-08-04 Thread Darren Martz
Thanks for the response!! I tried moving the readonly statement to the individual service entries. Two things happened... 1) I was able to browse but not write even though smbstatus shows that I am connected as an authorized user. 2) As an anonymous users, even public shares now require author

[Samba] Re: Security Hell

2004-08-04 Thread Jim C.
Darren Martz wrote: Problems: 1) when I change readonly to yes in global and authorized users do not have write access. Suggest not putting it in global. Put it in the individual shares. 2) when I leave readonly in global as 'no' then "nobody" can write and change files?? 3) when I add "nobody = *