On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
I get the idea from man smbmount that smbmount is merely a wrapper
invoking mount -t cifs.
Would you expect different results if I were using the smbmount
binary instead?
In the sense that it would invoke the deprecated mount -t smbfs
Michael Lueck wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
What are the samba server side settings(smb.conf) for the share you
are mounting?
[data]
comment = Shared Application Data Files
path = /srv/shares/data
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0666
directory mask = 0777
Do you
Chris Smith wrote:
In the sense that it would invoke the deprecated mount -t smbfs
instead of mount -t cifs, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Aaahhh, so smbclient from the Samba developers is hard coded to not use current
smb protocol code? Confusing!
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
Aaahhh, so smbclient from the Samba developers is hard coded to not
use current smb protocol code? Confusing!
Smbclient is new to the conversation, which until now has been about
smbmount which
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct way
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Drats, it looks like you're setup fine. I was hoping it would just be a
bad configuration. I don't know what else it could be.
Thanks for at least checking everything is configured correctly.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
--
To
Chris Smith wrote:
Smbclient is new to the conversation, which until now has been about
smbmount which
My error. Yes, I meant smbmount and not smbclient.
So mount -t cifs would be the most correct way to make a
connection?
It is considered the best way under the vast majority of
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings-
I am working through coming up with a Linux client integration to Samba
PDC's.
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs -o
credentials=/home/userid/.smbcredentials,uid=userid,gid=userid,dmask=0777,fmask=0666
//ldslnx01/data
Michael Lueck wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Could it be that '/' is mounted with an explicit permission setting
that is shadowing your mount settings?
I do not think so, but have a look. This share happens to be on the /srv
partition.
/dev/sda1 / xfs defaults
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Could
it be that '/' is mounted with an explicit permission setting that is
shadowing your mount settings?
I do not think so, but have a look. This share happens to be on the /srv
partition.
/dev/sda1 / xfs defaults0 1
/dev/sda9
Chris Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Michael Lueck wrote:
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs
Subject line is misleading: smbmount != cifs.
I get the idea from man smbmount that smbmount is merely a wrapper invoking
mount -t cifs.
Would you
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
What are the samba server side settings(smb.conf) for the share you are
mounting?
[data]
comment = Shared Application Data Files
path = /srv/shares/data
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0666
directory mask = 0777
Do you have inherit
11 matches
Mail list logo
