Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Jeremy,
I think I can see the blind spot at play here: The signal genius of the core
members of the Samba project is in being able to take a poorly-documented,
haphazardly-designed interface - Microsoft's - and nonetheless make
something that works with it. Samba's developer
ed and serious discussion!
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Whit Blauvelt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: winbind - not ready for prime time?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2
Christian McHugh wrote:
> Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
>> Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If you have a specific issue, ask it. If you have a specific
>>> bug, report it. You did none of those things.
>>>
>>
>> Im not a developer, Im a sysadmin and I been using samba for a lot of
>> years know.
Guido Lorenzutti wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
If you have a specific issue, ask it. If you have a specific
bug, report it. You did none of those things.
Im not a developer, Im a sysadmin and I been using samba for a lot of
years know.
When I read the post, I wasn't going to answear, '
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:33:37PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>> Gee thanks, Jeremy, for a personal attack rather than addressing any of the
>> specifics raised.
>>
>
> You raised no specifics. All you posted was a general whine
> "I can't make it work". Well poor
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:22:42PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I think I can see the blind spot at play here: The signal genius of the core
> members of the Samba project is in being able to take a poorly-documented,
> haphazardly-designed interface - Microsoft's - and nonetheless ma
Jeremy,
I think I can see the blind spot at play here: The signal genius of the core
members of the Samba project is in being able to take a poorly-documented,
haphazardly-designed interface - Microsoft's - and nonetheless make
something that works with it. Samba's developers, of all the open-sour
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 04:33:37PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> Gee thanks, Jeremy, for a personal attack rather than addressing any of the
> specifics raised.
You raised no specifics. All you posted was a general whine
"I can't make it work". Well poor you. You obviously have
no concept of the d
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
I'm looking for somerecognition that the Samba project may have gone astray in
the decision to
package winbind as part of the main package, given the many specific
shortcomings
No problems with doing that. I'm pretty sure some of the little tools,
scripts and gadgets for ot
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 16:33 -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> My ethic has always been: If there's a rock in the path, I remove it so the
> next person along doesn't trip over it. If something's clearly not
> documented, or not performing according to common sense expectations and a
> fair reading of
Gee thanks, Jeremy, for a personal attack rather than addressing any of the
specifics raised. I'm not looking for a flame war. I'm looking for some
recognition that the Samba project may have gone astray in the decision to
package winbind as part of the main package, given the many specific
shortco
11 matches
Mail list logo
