Hello list,
I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the
removal of the following config parameters:
security mask
force security mode
directory mask
force directory security mode
I have a couple questions regarding this, and haven't really seen any
good info on it,
On 03/07/13 19:56, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
[SNIP]
I have a situation currently where it looks like I will need to
implement the above 'force' settings in my samba 3.x environment to deal
with some misbehaving OS X clients that insist on stripping group
permissions from files in certain situatio
On 7/3/2013 4:54 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
My guess is this is related to the Unix extensions. Basically certain
versions of OS X; I can't remember which ones but 10.5 sticks in my
mind but that might be related to symbolic links and it was 10.6 that
was the problem, notice the file server do
I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At
least question 1?
Thanks,
Brian
On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the
removal of the following config parameters:
security mask
force security mod
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At
> least question 1?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
>
> On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> >I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in
>
On 05/07/13 16:10, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
On 7/3/2013 4:54 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
My guess is this is related to the Unix extensions. Basically certain
versions of OS X; I can't remember which ones but 10.5 sticks in my
mind but that might be related to symbolic links and it was 10.6 that
w
