Re: [Samba] Replacing Win2000 DC with Samba4 - Success!

2013-05-07 Thread Lukas Gradl
Zitat von Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org: On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 14:42 +, Lukas Gradl wrote: Hi! Did you record the details of why this didn't work? While I've expressed some hesitation at Windows 2000 support here previously, the one exception to that is for this kind of migration.

Re: [Samba] Replacing Win2000 DC with Samba4 - Success!

2013-05-02 Thread Phil Quesinberry
Hi Andrew, I posted an updated message on this with a fair amount of detail just before I saw Lukus' posting here: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/4-05-stable-domain-join-attempt-failing-with-quot-NO-DNS-zone-information-found-in-source-domain-not0-tt4647537.html

[Samba] Replacing Win2000 DC with Samba4 - Success!

2013-05-01 Thread Lukas Gradl
Hi! Just wanted to share a little success story: We where asked to replace a Win2000 DC deployed by another company which is'nt existing any more. As our focus is software development on linux we wanted to deploy a Samba-server instead of Windows. So after some trial and error and a lot

Re: [Samba] Replacing Win2000 DC with Samba4 - Success!

2013-05-01 Thread Phil Quesinberry
Samba4 is not able to migrate from Win2000 directly - we think this problem is not sufficiently addressed in the docs and in the wiki. So our first attempts to do so did not succeed. I have to agree, this explains the problem we were having. Apparently your research Kung Fu is better than

Re: [Samba] Replacing Win2000 DC with Samba4 - Success!

2013-05-01 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 14:42 +, Lukas Gradl wrote: Hi! Just wanted to share a little success story: We where asked to replace a Win2000 DC deployed by another company which is'nt existing any more. As our focus is software development on linux we wanted to deploy a Samba-server

Re: [Samba] Replacing Win2000 DC with Samba4 - Success!

2013-05-01 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 08:21 -0700, Phil Quesinberry wrote: Samba4 is not able to migrate from Win2000 directly - we think this problem is not sufficiently addressed in the docs and in the wiki. So our first attempts to do so did not succeed. I have to agree, this explains the problem we