Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
No problem. To the 3.4 branch or the 4.0? Also, as I stated before,
I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.
3.4. please.
Volker
Here ya go. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns:
https:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
> No problem. To the 3.4 branch or the 4.0? Also, as I stated before,
> I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.
3.4. please.
Volker
pgpU2G7uFn8Br.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the foll
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:36:12PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
ppolicy overlay?
As we are working more actively with bugzilla ag
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:36:12PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
> Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
> for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
> ppolicy overlay?
As we are working more actively with bugzilla again now, can
you ple
Hey folks,
Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
ppolicy overlay?
Thread references on the subject where I've asked before are listed below:
* http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/20
