On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 21:05, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 21:28, Kristyan Osborne wrote:
> > >Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
> > Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
>
> Which was unfortunately stripped. Was this
And on the subject of SUS, am I right in thinking it doesn't need
CALs for the host server for each client ? Ie, a base server with 5
cals would be enough to run it on.
Simon
--
Simon Hobson MA MIEE, Technology Specialist
Colony Gift Corporation Limited
Lindal in Furness, Ulverston, Cumbria, LA1
Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
Which was unfortunately stripped. Was this just the one that I posted
to the list a while back?
I really should put my collection of these up somewher
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 21:28, Kristyan Osborne wrote:
> >Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
> Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
Which was unfortunately stripped. Was this just the one that I posted
to the list a while back?
I reall
I use tqcrunas / regedit via the login script. Here's my .reg file for
the update
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]
"WUServer"="http://serverurlgoeshere";
"WUStatusServer"="http://serverurlgoeshere";
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SO
Mattia schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm here again ith a non-strictly samba related problem, but I hope
someone in the list has already faced and perhaps solved it...
I've got a 60 clients network (most Windows 200 and XP) organized in a
domain. The pdc and bdc run on Fedora 2 + samba 3.0.7-2.FC2 +
openldap
Kristyan Osborne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
That's nice, thank you a lot.
The only disadvantage of this approach is that I have to manua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>>Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
>>
>> Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
>That's nice, thank you a lot.
>The only disadvantage of this approach is that I have to manually walk
>t
Kristyan Osborne wrote:
Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
That's nice, thank you a lot.
The only disadvantage of this approach is that I have to manually walk
to every user's desk and import the ad
>Has anyone of you guys ever tried a setup like this?
Yes. Use NT policy editor. I have attached the policy file I use for SUS updates.
Cheers
-
Kristyan Osborne - IT Technician
Longhill High School
01273 391672 / 304086
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and re
Hi all,
I'm here again ith a non-strictly samba related problem, but I hope
someone in the list has already faced and perhaps solved it...
I've got a 60 clients network (most Windows 200 and XP) organized in a
domain. The pdc and bdc run on Fedora 2 + samba 3.0.7-2.FC2 +
openldap-2.1.29-1, and e
11 matches
Mail list logo
