Re: [Samba] Samba 3 smbstatus not as good

2004-08-02 Thread Tom Schaefer
Andrew, I dug into it a bit and managed to steal the few relevant lines of code from 2.2.8a status.c and replace the ones in 3.0.5 to make my own smbstatus. Now it works perfectly for me displaying any forced users and groups just like it did in Samba 2.x. I still don't really get why you took t

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 smbstatus not as good

2004-07-31 Thread Tom Schaefer
At 07:54 AM 7/31/04, Andrew Bartlett wrote: The problem is, that information is not valid, except in 'security=share' and 'force user' cases. In all other cases, the user that connects to the share is not necessarily connected to the user actually accessing the share. Thankyou very much for respon

Re: [Samba] Samba 3 smbstatus not as good

2004-07-31 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 01:05, Tom Schaefer wrote: > I use a lot of "force user" and "force group" directives on various > shares. With smbstatus of Samba 2 I could always verify with a glance > what uid and gid a particular service is being accessed as, with Samba 3 > you can't. I'd REALLY like to

[Samba] Samba 3 smbstatus not as good

2004-07-30 Thread Tom Schaefer
I use a lot of "force user" and "force group" directives on various shares. With smbstatus of Samba 2 I could always verify with a glance what uid and gid a particular service is being accessed as, with Samba 3 you can't. I'd REALLY like to see that come back to smbstatus. Here's a real world ex