On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 16:36 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 20:41 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > I can confirm by uninstalling and re-installing that patch
>
> Each patch has a Q number. Can you tell us what it is, so we can
> pursue our testing?
I thought that he
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 20:41 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> I can confirm by uninstalling and re-installing that patch
Each patch has a Q number. Can you tell us what it is, so we can
pursue our testing?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abar
I can confirm by uninstalling and re-installing that patch the problem
exists and is fixed by removing that patch on two separate windows 2000
professional (SP4) machines and additionally; another win2k box (sp1?)
with no patches never had any problem during any of this (used as a
control).
On
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Piszcz wrote:
| I have found the problem; it was a single patch
| from microsoft, remove it and fixed! :)
which patch ? We'll need to fix Samba to work with it.
Samba 3.0.11, AIX 5.2 & linux RH9 2.4.20-28.9smp
win200
Hallo Justin Piszcz,
> I have found the problem; it was a single patch from microsoft, remove it
> and fixed! :)
>
Please can you tell us the Patchnumber?
Greetings
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/li
The patch fixes a 'drag and drop' vulnerability.
The patch ID is: KB890047
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-008.mspx?pf=true
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Piszcz wrote:
| I have found the problem; it wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Piszcz wrote:
| I have found the problem; it was a single patch
| from microsoft, remove it and fixed! :)
which patch ? We'll need to fix Samba to work with it.
cheers, jerry
ect: Re: [SPAM] Re: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.10 - Error With Latest
> Win2K Patches
>
> I have found the problem; it was a single patch from microsoft, remove it
> and fixed! :)
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Andreas Koch wrote:
>
> > Yes i have the ServicePack 4 on my Win2K,
I have found the problem; it was a single patch from microsoft, remove it
and fixed! :)
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Andreas Koch wrote:
Yes i have the ServicePack 4 on my Win2K, and is works fine.
Set your debug Level to 10 and debug it...
I have not this Problem and the same Server and Client.
I Think
Yes i have the ServicePack 4 on my Win2K, and is works fine.
Set your debug Level to 10 and debug it...
I have not this Problem and the same Server and Client.
I Think Win2K have a security-user Patch in the Service Pack 4 and this
make your Problems.
You must debug your Problem, or i hope oth
Just a note: It has _ALWAYS_ worked, I applied the patches on Windows 2000
yesterday and it stopped working after that.
Perhaps a Windows 2000 problem? Do you use Windows 2000 and have updated
to the latest patches? *THAT* is when the error began!
Here it is:
# The global is required for all g
When Microsoft released their 8-9 new patches this week, around Tuesday,
02/08/05; I can no longer copy files to any of my samba shares.
Before Microsoft's patches, everything worked OK; I have multiple Linux
SAMBA servers and two separate Windows 2000 Professional SP4 machines;
each were patch
12 matches
Mail list logo
