Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-11 Thread FC Mario Patty
We have 570 samba users and not more than half of that got samba server access. Currently there are 39 users connected to samba and each of them occupies 14-16Mb of RAM. Besides that there are root processes 3-5 times smbd processes (each accupies 14-16Mb of RAM too). I know that sometimes samba ne

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-11 Thread Javier Barroso
Hi, On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM, FC Mario Patty wrote: > Hi guys, > > My samba server stop to respond many times today even though I've upgraded > the memory from 1Gb to 5Gb (it keeps eating my memory out). How a samba server could eat 5 Gb ? How many users has you got ? which proccess is eat

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-10 Thread FC Mario Patty
Hi Henkel, I've finally succeed rpmbuild-ing samba, but this time it's the newest release of samba, the 3.2.6 version. To handle the cifs.upcall.8.gz thing, I added %{_mandir}/man8/cifs.upcall.8* in the respective line in samba.spec. I also installed ccache so I don't have to uncomment the ccach

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-08 Thread FC Mario Patty
Hi, You're right. I got this after changing samba.spec: Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 RPM build errors: File listed twice: samba-3.3.0rc1.tar.gz File not found: /home/tilangga/tmp/samba-3.3.0rc1-root/usr/sbin/cifs.upcall

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-08 Thread FC Mario Patty
Guys, I keep trying to use the original samba-3.3.0rc1 from samba.org. I cannot rpmbuild the tar.gz file because it seems that mount.cifs.c don't have a clue about the location of unlock_mtab and lock_mtab function, although it has been stated in mount.h and defined in mtab.c (both mount.cifs.c an

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-06 Thread FC Mario Patty
Hi, I've downloaded samba-3.3.0 rpm(s) and simulated the upgrade but got error message: error: Failed dependencies: keyutils-libs is needed by cifs-mount-3.3.0-14.1.i386 perl-ldap is needed by ldapsmb-1.34b-14.1.i386 libkeyutils.so.1 is needed by samba3-cifsmount-3.2.5-37.

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-05 Thread Miguel Medalha
Version 3.3.0 (Testing) is here: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/samba:/TESTING/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-05 Thread Miguel Medalha
Maybe the answer to your problem is here: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/recent/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 3.3.0rc1 for production server - is it save?

2008-12-05 Thread FC Mario Patty
Hi guys, My samba server stop to respond many times today even though I've upgraded the memory from 1Gb to 5Gb (it keeps eating my memory out). I've tried samba 3.0.32, 3.2.4 before, but no success. I go to samba.org and found samba-3.3.0rc1. Is it save to use it in our production server? I'm real