...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von Gerry Reno
Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. März 2013 14:14
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Samba 4 AD DC and BIND
When setting up Samba 4 AD DC to use BIND DNS is it possible to use BIND
located on a separate server?
Or do you need
When I ran the provision I selected BIND9_DLZ.
The provision did not prompt me for a DNS forwarder IP.
So after the provision finished I entered the DNS forwarder IP manually into
smb.conf.
Should the provision have prompted for the DNS forwarder IP?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
With the BIND9_DLZ backend, bind actually handles the forwarding, so you
will need to set that up in your named conf, something like the following:
options {
forwarders { 192.249.249.1; 192.249.249.3; };
};
Although, some distros break apart the named stuff, so you may need to find
information
On 03/11/2013 12:53 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
With the BIND9_DLZ backend, bind actually handles the forwarding, so you will
need to set that up in your named conf,
something like the following:
options {
forwarders { 192.249.249.1; 192.249.249.3; };
};
Although, some distros break apart the
On 11/03/13 16:30, Gerry Reno wrote:
When I ran the provision I selected BIND9_DLZ.
The provision did not prompt me for a DNS forwarder IP.
So after the provision finished I entered the DNS forwarder IP manually into
smb.conf.
Should the provision have prompted for the DNS forwarder IP?
Since I am using views, where should I include the provision-generated
named.conf?
Just in the local network view?
-Gerry
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Sorry I don't understand what you mean by views... the provision generated
named.conf should be inserted into your /etc/named/named.conf (again this
varies on different distros) as an include directive, it is not meant to be
a full named.conf.
Ricky
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno
On 03/11/2013 08:27 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
Sorry I don't understand what you mean by views... the provision generated
named.conf should be inserted into your
/etc/named/named.conf (again this varies on different distros) as an include
directive, it is not meant to be a full
named.conf.
I am not 100% sure, but anywhere in the named.conf config should be
sufficient, DLZ is Dynamically Loadable Zones, so samba ends up being its
own zone as far as I know.
Ricky
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net wrote:
On 03/11/2013 08:27 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
On 03/11/2013 08:50 PM, Ricky Nance wrote:
I am not 100% sure, but anywhere in the named.conf config should be
sufficient, DLZ is Dynamically Loadable Zones, so
samba ends up being its own zone as far as I know.
Ricky
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Gerry Reno gr...@verizon.net
Hi all,
The user properties does not appear to guide dialing. This feature is
available in Samba4?
Thanks
--
Celso Vianna
BSD User: 51318
http://www.bsdcounter.org
Palmas/TO
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
When setting up Samba 4 AD DC to use BIND DNS is it possible to use BIND
located on a separate server?
Or do you need to run BIND on the same machine as Samba 4 AD DC?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hello,
I have successfully joined a SBS 2003 (SRVACMPDC01) domain with two
additional Samba 4 DCs (SAMBA4PDC and SAMBA4DEDI, currently both
4.0.4-GIT-9899851). Everything worked fine: DNS / AD replication etc.
The windows server was still responsible for DNS / DHCP / all FSMO
roles. Now the
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Celso Viana celso.via...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
Does anyone know if it is possible to authenticate an ftp server
(proftpd or vsftpd) based LDAP Samba 4?
Thanks
Why would you *want* to? FTP handles passwords in clear text. FTPS can
be done more securely,
that the changes then also
cause normal code paths to be followed for this user).
Many thanks for the follow-up - much appreciated,
Cheers,
Tris.
-Original Message-
From: Tris Mabbs
Sent: 07 March 2013 12:16
To: 'Guenther Deschner'
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 4 - smbd; can't parse the PAC
that the changes then also
cause normal code paths to be followed for this user).
Many thanks for the follow-up - much appreciated,
Cheers,
Tris.
-Original Message-
From: Tris Mabbs
Sent: 07 March 2013 12:16
To: 'Guenther Deschner'
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba 4 - smbd; can't parse the PAC
Message-
From: Michael Wood
Sent: 08 March 2013 10:33
To: Tris Mabbs
Cc: Guenther Deschner; Andrew Bartlett; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 - smbd; can't parse the PAC:
NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error but only for a single domain user (Server
2008 R2 domain, Server 2008
-
From: Michael Wood
Sent: 08 March 2013 10:33
To: Tris Mabbs
Cc: Guenther Deschner; Andrew Bartlett; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 - smbd; can't parse the PAC:
NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error but only for a single domain user (Server
2008 R2 domain, Server 2008 functional
Hello again everyone,
On 08 March 2013 13:10, Michael Wood wrote:
...
---Cut here.
Sorry, I forgot a step. You would have needed a git fetch gd in there
before the checkout.
Ah ha! That would explain it then.
Well, forgotten command or not, the help was much appreciated and I now have
Hello guys,
Does anyone know if it is possible to authenticate an ftp server
(proftpd or vsftpd) based LDAP Samba 4?
Thanks
--
Celso Vianna
BSD User: 51318
http://www.bsdcounter.org
Palmas/TO
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hello,
I've seen this upgrade error posted before:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-January/171022.html
but either there is a different issue or I'm misreading the post.
Basically when I run the classicupgrade (samba3 to 4) on a test machine,
I get the following (the full debug
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 22:33 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Hiya Günther,
Absolutely - I'm really sorry, I intended to try this today but haven't had
the chance.
Hopefully I will get the chance tomorrow, and I'll let you know the results.
Many thanks, much appreciated :-)
Where did we get
Is there a reasonable to get the Samba 4 dns to deal with dynamic dns
and dhcp?
-jimc
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hi Folks,
I think about to migrate my smb3 PDC to samba 4 due to the administrative
benefit regarding my win-clients. For file sharing I do not have to use the ACL
at all. My problem is on smb4 the understanding of right management in this
case. If I just put 'nt acl support = no' to my share
Dynamic DNS updating is failing (which is bizarre, because I could have
sworn I'd had it working before). Help?
Setup: Samba 4 DC running bind 9.9.2, Samba 3.6.3 member
The output of net -d10 ads join is attached, compressed.
Interesting portions of named.conf:
options {
(no allow-updates
Ok, I will reinstall samba4 by FreeBSD port.
Thanks!
On 28-02-2013 16:47, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
Hi, Ricardo!
That's not the FreeBSD port. Dunno, where did you get that. Please, update
your ports tree with 'make update' via SVN or portsnap. And better before
building one remove all the
Hi Triss,
can you test this branch?
https://git.samba.org/?p=gd/samba/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-krb5pac
It contains fixes for various pac buffer types.
Let us know if it resolves your issues.
Thanks,
Guenther
--
Günther DeschnerGPG-ID: 8EE11688
Red Hat
Hi ,
I 've been trying to get my 2 Samba DCs to replicate between each other
but it fails
DC1: Freebsd-9.1-Release, Samba 4.02, hostname ldap1, objectGUID:
a2454bb4-9f94-4879-a5ff-c1a40537cb5e
DC2: Freebsd-9.1-Release, Samba 4.02, hostname ldap2, objectGUID:
Do yo use port version of Samba4? If not - why?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ricardo Suguita rsugu...@unicamp.brwrote:
Hi ,
I 've been trying to get my 2 Samba DCs to replicate between each other
but it fails
DC1: Freebsd-9.1-Release, Samba 4.02, hostname ldap1, objectGUID:
Yes, Samba4 was installed by ports
===
cd /usr/ports
fetch -o - -q
https://bitbucket.org/gugabsd/freebsd-samba4-port/get/default.tar.gz |
tar zxvf -
mv gugabsd-freebsd-samba4-port-d638b66aa1fe net/samba4
cd net/samba4
make install clean
==
Thanks!
On 28-02-2013 13:13, Timur I. Bakeyev
I changed my /etc/krb5.conf but the replication still fails.
Thanks!
On 28-02-2013 13:02, Johan Johansson wrote:
I had similar problems and resolved it by making sure my /etc/krb5.conf got
updated to this (change realm to your realm):
[libdefaults]
default_realm = CORP.LO
Hi, Ricardo!
That's not the FreeBSD port. Dunno, where did you get that. Please, update
your ports tree with 'make update' via SVN or portsnap. And better before
building one remove all the installed dependencies you got from this port.
Regards,
Timur.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Ricardo
]
Sent: 28 February 2013 15:09
To: Tris Mabbs
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 - smbd; can't parse the PAC:
NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error but only for a single domain user (Server
2008 R2 domain, Server 2008 functional level forest).
Hi Triss,
can you test this branch
Hi.
Where might I find some kind of reference for the messages generated by
'make test'? I would at least like to know which ones I can safely ignore.
Thanks
-jimc
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 15:51 -0800, The Jimmest wrote:
Hi.
Where might I find some kind of reference for the messages generated by
'make test'? I would at least like to know which ones I can safely ignore.
Failing tests are already screened out by our 'knownfail' and 'flapping'
and 'skip'
On 27 Feb 2013, at 2:26 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 12:17 +0800, Kinglok, Fong wrote:
In fact, I have tried using NTLM already.
I have successfully setup winbind bundled with Samba 4, including the steps
to join Samba 4 as member server and start up winbindd as
I do so enjoy working with users who I can ask to 'put some code in' and who
can handle this so well :-).
Why thank you, kind Sir :-)
I do so enjoy working with people who quite obviously really, REALLY, know
their subject :-)
In my case, evidence only of far too many years stuck in front of a
I do so enjoy working with users who I can ask to 'put some code in' and who
can handle this so well :-).
TM Why thank you, kind Sir :-)
TM I do so enjoy working with people who quite obviously really, REALLY, know
their subject :-)
TM In my case, evidence only of far too many years stuck
I do so enjoy working with users who I can ask to 'put some code in' and who
can handle this so well :-).
Why thank you, kind Sir :-)
I do so enjoy working with people who quite obviously really, REALLY, know
their subject :-) In my case, evidence only of far too many years stuck in
front of
On 25/02/13 22:44, Scott Whitten wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to integrate Samba 4 DHCPD and Bind 9.9 into a complete solution.
I'm using the BIND/Samba 4 DLZ plugin.
DHCP by itself works and hands out IP addresses.
What I would like to have happen is the following:
- PC is joined to the Samba
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 11:51 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Hello,
We're having a problem with Samba 4 joined to a Server 2008 R2 domain
(at Server 2008 functional level across the forest).
The interesting thing is that this only affects a single user - all other
accounts work without
-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: 26 February 2013 11:05
To: Tris Mabbs
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4 - smbd; can't parse the PAC:
NT_STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error but only for a single domain user (Server
2008 R2 domain, Server 2008 functional level
On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 11:22 +, Tris Mabbs wrote:
Wow.
Hiya Andrew,
OK, this sounds like a very promising approach, and potentially saves me
working through a large number of git bisects (as also most helpfully
suggested by Michael Wood) - so far, I'm right back into the beta code
What I was getting at about the full name is that if this was a odd character
encoding issue, knowing that this was a user with non-ascii full name would
be an important data point.
Yes, I see what you mean.
No, neither the full username, nor the login name, contain anything other than
Hello,
We're having a problem with Samba 4 joined to a Server 2008 R2 domain
(at Server 2008 functional level across the forest).
The interesting thing is that this only affects a single user - all other
accounts work without problems.
When accessing our main server using that account,
Hi
You might try getting a packet capture.
By the way, what's common between the user before you deleted the
account and the one you created later, besides the username? The
password? Can you replicate this in a test environment?
If you can replicate this in a test environment and you know
Hiya Michael,
Many thanks for the quick and helpful response.
Yes, I can certainly try a packet capture; I think I'll go with your other
suggestion first though, that of using git bisect to track down the
problematic version.
I'm sorry, that should have occurred to me .
Once I've
Hi All,
I'm trying to integrate Samba 4 DHCPD and Bind 9.9 into a complete solution.
I'm using the BIND/Samba 4 DLZ plugin.
DHCP by itself works and hands out IP addresses.
What I would like to have happen is the following:
- PC is joined to the Samba 4 domain (this works)
- PC gets an IP via
Hi,
My goal is to make use of samba 4 and freeradius to authenticate user to use
wifi network (WPA2 enterprise).
The setup is to setup Samba 4.0.3 in machine A and setup freeradius in machine
B.
By reading:
Document A: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/beyond
Document B:
Hi,
where could i find documentation on setting up samba 4?
Thanks in advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Did you compile Samba --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Hervé Hénoch h.hen...@isc84.org wrote:
Hello Franck
I had the same problem. When I removed config in the two lines, getent
group worked.
idmap config *:backend = tdb
idmap config *:range = 70001-8
Hi,
first hit on google.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO
grettings,
Markus
On 2013-02-21 12:17, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi,
where could i find documentation on setting up samba 4?
Thanks in advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 12:20 +0100, Markus Bajones wrote:
first hit on google.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO
Or, even *BETTER*, skip the stupid search engines [which will lead you
astray as often as not] - and just go to www.samba.org. Huge time
saver!
--
Adam Tauno
Hi
I configure a member server as discribe on this page :
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Domain_Member
My smb.conf looks like that :
[global]
workgroup = DDCS
security = ADS
realm = DDCS.LOCAL
encrypt passwords = yes
idmap config *:backend = tdb
idmap config
Without idmap line, it work too.
[global]
workgroup = DDCS
security = ADS
realm = DDCS.LOCAL
encrypt passwords = yes
# idmap config *:backend = tdb
# idmap config *:range = 70001-8
# idmap config DDCS:backend = ad
# idmap config DDCS:schema_mode = rfc2307
# idmap
I'm about to fund development of an OpenEmbedded recipe to build Samba 4 on
a Beagleboard XM (TI OMAP family).
If anyone's done this already or is actively working on it, please get in
touch with me so we can avoid duplicating efforts.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hello Franck
I had the same problem. When I removed config in the two lines, getent
group worked.
idmap config *:backend = tdb
idmap config *:range = 70001-8
For the role of idmap you can read :
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/idmapper.html
Regards
Le
I've been looking around trying to find status on Samba 4 AD DC using MIT
Kerberos and didn't find anything real recent.
Most of the wiki, list posts I see are about a year old talking about this.
I'd like to know if there has been progress on this. Is it 0% , 99%?
I saw that Fedora F18 had
Dear all,
After setting dos charset = CP950 (which is the codepage for traditional
chinese), the same error still remains.
Furthermore, I have tried testing in a real production environment by the
following steps:
1. In smb.conf,
I create a share called Chinese and increase the log
Dear all,
I have created another test case for the problem.
Rather testing in domU, running Debian Wheezy, I have constructed another
machine without running xen and installed with Debian squeeze.
I have successfully setup samba 4.0.3 and create a folder called
$BCf9AL7=b(B in share named
From: Kinglok, Fong busywa...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:40:49 +0800
Thank you for your help but…
I execute some commands to make sure the locale is in UTF-8 by
dpkg-reconfigure locales and even adding setting in /etc/environment
and using utility like convmv to turn all file and
Hi !
I have installed a DC with samba-tool command and it works perfectly !
Control AD with the 2003 tools is very amazing, thanks for the job !
So, my next step is to install a file server as a member of the AD and
not as a DC
I read carfully this one :
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 16:54 +0100, BOTZ Franck (Informaticien) - DDT
67/SG/MGI/CI wrote:
Hi !
I have installed a DC with samba-tool command and it works perfectly !
Control AD with the 2003 tools is very amazing, thanks for the job !
So, my next step is to install a file server as a
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 10:14 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hello,
you should watch the entertaining talk about Samba 4 from Jeremey he gave at
FOSDEM!
http://video.fosdem.org/2013/maintracks/Janson/Samba4.webm
I also spoke at two miniconfs this year about Samba 4.0.
This talk is a 25
My machine is running samba 4.0.3 inside a DomU of Debian Wheezy.
Following the Samba AD Howto and running Samba 4.0.3 successfully but with one
pretty serious problem. When I try access the folder with 1000 files, the
speed is *VERY* slow.
After employ log level to 3, log.smbd is flooded
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:54:26PM +0800, Kinglok, Fong wrote:
My machine is running samba 4.0.3 inside a DomU of Debian Wheezy.
Following the Samba AD Howto and running Samba 4.0.3 successfully but with
one pretty serious problem. When I try access the folder with 1000 files,
the speed
You had better set 'dos charset' parameter correctly and 'unix charset'
parameter if you do not use UTF-8 on Linux.
From: Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 09:04:47 -0800
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:54:26PM +0800, Kinglok, Fong wrote:
My machine is running samba 4.0.3 inside a
Thank you for your help but…
I execute some commands to make sure the locale is in UTF-8 by
dpkg-reconfigure locales and even adding setting in /etc/environment
and using utility like convmv to turn all file and folder into UTF-8 (in fact,
they were in UTF-8 already.)
I add option in smb.conf
Using \\dcname.corp.domain.com\share or \\your_ip\share works?
Check also security tab on folder to set right permsission.
Il 07/02/2013 08.14, Nick Semenkovich ha scritto:
Hi:
I've just configured a Samba 4 install as an AD DC, following the Wiki
page at
Ah yeah, that definitely works #facepalm
I guess I figured \\corp.domain.com should just fail entirely (though
netlogon and sysvol work) -- \\dcname.corp.domain.com works perfectly.
Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Ufficiotecnico Acknow
ufficiotecn...@acknow.it wrote:
Using
Hi:
I've just configured a Samba 4 install as an AD DC, following the Wiki
page at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO
I've successfully joined a few machines to the domain, and am now
trying to add some simple shares.
When I add a share to smb.conf, it appears on client machines
From: Celso Viana celso.via...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 22:17:07 -0300
I'm testing the SaMBa 4 with FreeBSD 9.1 and am having difficulty.
(snip)
bin/samba-tool user add fox '@Pipe120' --home-directory='\\samba\fox'
--home-drive=M --given-name=User Test
wbinfo -i fox
Hi guys,
I'm testing the SaMBa 4 with FreeBSD 9.1 and am having difficulty.
I did so:
mkdir test
cd test
wget http://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/samba-4.0.2.tar.gz
tar zxvf samba-4.0.2.tar.gz
cd samba-4.0.2
./configure make make install
cd /usr/local/samba
bin/samba-tool domain provision
So, I have working builds of Samba 3.6.10, and 4.0.2 using the traditional
build system on AIX, both built with XLC.
For historical reasons, we're needing to use 'encrypt passwords = no', so that
Samba uses the OS password.
The odd thing, is, the 3.6.10 Samba works just fine, but the 4.0.2
, or is it hopeless?
Thanks!
-Ben
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] on behalf
of Benjamin Huntsman [bhunts...@mail2.cu-portland.edu]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:47 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Samba 4 vs Samba 3
Hi,
ACLS are a pain in general. Fortunately we do not need it for our shares, so I
thought to just add the following to my share definition in smb.conf.
nt acl support = no
This should be fine, isn't it?
Further I only need access permissions per share but I realized that the group
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 14:32 +0100, Fred F wrote:
Thanks for your statement, Andrew. I know about winbind and we've used
it in the past, but I remember there were some issues when dealing
with POSIX ACLs and windbind.
Now while winbind might work in some environments, I think it would be
Thanks for your statement, Andrew. I know about winbind and we've used
it in the past, but I remember there were some issues when dealing
with POSIX ACLs and windbind.
Now while winbind might work in some environments, I think it would be
much nicer and cleaner to integrate Linux clients into a
2013/1/22 Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu:
I don't agree, because users can be members of multiple groups, not just the
group identified as their primary group
Well, yes. That is not the point. Users can still be members of
multiple groups (e.g. CN=Domain Admins,CN=Users,CN=DOMAIN), through
the
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 18:29 +0100, Fred F wrote:
2013/1/22 Gémes Géza g...@kzsdabas.hu:
I don't agree, because users can be members of multiple groups, not just the
group identified as their primary group
Well, yes. That is not the point. Users can still be members of
multiple groups (e.g.
Hi,
I am still experimenting with Samba 4 and I'd like to serve both
Windows and Linux clients with Samba (standalone AD server). The
Windows-side is already working well. For serving Linux-clients I need
to store the users' uidNumber and gidNumber in the Active Directory.
This is how I do that:
2013-01-22 15:52 keltezéssel, Fred F írta:
Hi,
I am still experimenting with Samba 4 and I'd like to serve both
Windows and Linux clients with Samba (standalone AD server). The
Windows-side is already working well. For serving Linux-clients I need
to store the users' uidNumber and gidNumber in
Are the man pages not included with the Samba 4 distribution?
After running configure and make (using the old-style build environment under
source3), a make installman gives the the following error:
No manpages present. Development version maybe?
How would I go about getting the man pages
This was addressed on this list a while back, some people shared what
they had to do to get manpages. For more information, search that out,
but the gist should be that if you have the right packages (xsltproc and
docbook, maybe docbook-xsl?) installed on your system, man pages will
compile and
I had freshly installed an Ubuntu Server 12.04lts and Samba 4.0.1 using the
internal DNS.
I followed the official HowTo until kinit administrator@DOMAIN.LOCAL
It didn't work (cannot contact any kdc...)
A netstat showed that avahi-daemon was running at:
807/avahi-daemon: r
udp0 0
Without knowing the process by which data is added to the directory,
is there any logging output that shows LDIF data as entries are added?
... Or is the LDIF component more of a
translation layer? I've been scripting some tools to more easily
automate some of the Linux things I need but I
Ok, now I'm stuck...
We have several stand-alone UNIX (AIX) systems that we need to share a few SMB
shares from. None of these are joined to our domain.
We want the end-users to be able to map these shares to their Windows systems
using the username in the form of AIXSERVER\username, and
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:09:43PM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
Ok, now I'm stuck...
We have several stand-alone UNIX (AIX) systems that we need to share a few
SMB shares from. None of these are joined to our domain.
We want the end-users to be able to map these shares to their
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:09:43PM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
Ok, now I'm stuck...
We have several stand-alone UNIX (AIX) systems that we need to share a few
SMB shares from. None of these are joined to our domain.
Anyone know how to set up pam_smbpass on AIX?
I'm thinking that's going to be the way to go...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello,
thanks with the good job with samba 4.
I was wondering, is there a possibility to use an already encrypted password
like sambaNTPassword or {SSHA} encrypted password with samba-tool user command ?
Regards,
Serge Conrad
Une messagerie gratuite, garantie à vie et des services en plus, ça
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:41 +0100, sergio.conrad wrote:
Hello,
thanks with the good job with samba 4.
I was wondering, is there a possibility to use an already encrypted password
like sambaNTPassword or {SSHA} encrypted password with samba-tool user
command ?
We need the plaintext
Just to report back in on this, the traditional build system under source3
worked for us, and we were able to build and install a working set of Samba
binaries. At this time, we only need the file server bits.
I'll give the new build system another shot when 4.0.1 comes out.
Thanks again!
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:09:55AM +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
Those should have been linked into smbd directly as configure on AIX
adds vfs_aixacl to the list of modules to be compiled statically.
Would you mind opening a bug on https://bugzilla.samba.org for tracking?
Cheers,
] SAMBA 4 acting as Domain Server- Is Exchange 2010 capable
of being installed?
Hello All,
SAMBA 4 is a great advancement, and I have it up and running in a lab
environment authenticating Cisco UCM LDAP queries...
I am attempting to install an Exchange 2010 deployment for integrated UM
testing
: www.tropenklinik.de
---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
Im
Auftrag von Matthew Gear
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Januar 2013 05:03
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] SAMBA 4 acting
On 11 January 2013 05:02, Matthew Gear matthewj.g...@gmail.com wrote:
I am attempting to install an Exchange 2010 deployment for integrated UM
testing.
As I attempted to extend the schema of the SAMBA 4 AD (setup /ps), the
setup program came back and reported the following:
The Domain
...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Januar 2013 09:15
An: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] SAMBA 4 acting as Domain Server- Is Exchange 2010
capable of being installed?
Thank you for the reply Daniel!
Unfortunately, in my test scenario, Openchange does not have
Hi!
I've got troubles with dynamic dns updates.
Ubuntu: 12.04 / Samba 4.0.0 / followed off. howto
Winsrv: Server 2k8R2
root@tuxsrv:/home/schau# samba -V
Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-94f11e9
root@tuxsrv:/home/schau# kinit administrator@SCHAU.LOCAL
Password for administrator@SCHAU.LOCAL:
Hi,
first of all, sorry for my poor english.
I have installed Samba4 (stable tarball) on a fresh Centos 6.3 x64 server,
with the classicupgrade command.
With great difficulty I managed to correctly configure the DNS server
(bind).
kinit, smbclient and samba_dnsupdate - verbose - all-names give
201 - 300 of 911 matches
Mail list logo
