[Samba] Samba HA Issue Fixed, need clarifications.

2009-08-07 Thread David Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Turns out that the issue I was having regarding the inability to add computers to a domain in a fail over state using the backup PDC was a result of the computer(s) in question still having a record in LDAP. When I manually removed the computer record

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-06 Thread David Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Christensen wrote: > David Markey wrote: >> Yup unfortunately rights granted using net sam/rpc and usrmgr are saved >> locally in a TDB file(account_policy), this should probably be in LDAP, i >> suppose it sould be possible to rsync the tdb file

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread David Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Markey wrote: > Yup unfortunately rights granted using net sam/rpc and usrmgr are saved > locally in a TDB file(account_policy), this should probably be in LDAP, i > suppose it sould be possible to rsync the tdb file. > > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 1

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread John Du
David Markey wrote: Yup unfortunately rights granted using net sam/rpc and usrmgr are saved locally in a TDB file(account_policy), this should probably be in LDAP, i suppose it sould be possible to rsync the tdb file. On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:10:54 -0500, David Christensen wrote: -BEGIN P

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread David Markey
Yup unfortunately rights granted using net sam/rpc and usrmgr are saved locally in a TDB file(account_policy), this should probably be in LDAP, i suppose it sould be possible to rsync the tdb file. On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:10:54 -0500, David Christensen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread David Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Du wrote: > David Christensen wrote: > > Liutauras Adomaitis wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:39 PM, David > Christensen > wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > With samba

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread John Du
David Christensen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liutauras Adomaitis wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:39 PM, David Christensen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With samba configured for high availability using heartbeat, I am not able to join n

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread David Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liutauras Adomaitis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:39 PM, David > Christensen wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> With samba configured for high availability using heartbeat, I am not >> able to join new computers to the

Re: [Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-05 Thread Liutauras Adomaitis
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:39 PM, David Christensen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > With samba configured for high availability using heartbeat, I am not > able to join new computers to the domain after a fail over.  If I fail > back to the "main" samba instance I can joi

[Samba] Samba HA issue

2009-08-04 Thread David Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With samba configured for high availability using heartbeat, I am not able to join new computers to the domain after a fail over. If I fail back to the "main" samba instance I can join the computer to the domain. However With samba in a fail over sta