Re: [Samba] Samba4-alpha11

2010-05-17 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 17:21 -0700, t...@tms3.com wrote: > > > > > > --- Original message --- > > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba4-alpha11 > > From: Andrew Bartlett > > To: > > Cc: > > Date: Saturday, 15/05/2010 5:14 AM > > >

Re: [Samba] Samba4-alpha11

2010-05-15 Thread tms3
--- Original message --- Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba4-alpha11 From: Andrew Bartlett To: Cc: Date: Saturday, 15/05/2010 5:14 AM On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:21 -0700, t...@tms3.com wrote: Just thought I'd say that samba4 is working quite nicely. Samba4 DC on Ubuntu server. Added a W

Re: [Samba] Samba4-alpha11

2010-05-15 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 12:21 -0700, t...@tms3.com wrote: > Just thought I'd say that samba4 is working quite nicely. Samba4 DC > on Ubuntu server. Added a W2k3R2 and W2k8R2 server as DC's. Took a > little bit of play to get it done, but not much. > > The only thing I've noticed so far (still i

[Samba] Samba4-alpha11

2010-05-14 Thread tms3
Just thought I'd say that samba4 is working quite nicely. Samba4 DC on Ubuntu server. Added a W2k3R2 and W2k8R2 server as DC's. Took a little bit of play to get it done, but not much. The only thing I've noticed so far (still in early lab stage) is a GC issue. Now if I can upgrade a Samba