There's a thread here:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/170 (I'm posting as
*fireappleblackhttps://github.com/fireappleblack
)*
...Which implies that the hold-up (from a zfs-linux perspective) is the
lack of richacls support in the mainstream kernel at the moment. (E.g.
OpenSuse supports
Would the following be workable:
Run Samba 3 binaries in one linux OpenVZ instance to serve files.
Run Samba 4 binaries in another, separate OpenVZ instance as an AD domain
controller.
...all on the same physical machine?
http://wiki.openvz.org/
Separate note: I'd really like to see
Would the following be workable:
Run Samba 3 binaries in one linux OpenVZ instance to serve files.
Run Samba 4 binaries in another, separate OpenVZ instance as an AD domain
controller.
...all on the same physical machine?
http://wiki.openvz.org/
Separate note: I'd really like to see
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:44:25PM +0100, Ben Metcalfe wrote:
Would the following be workable:
Run Samba 3 binaries in one linux OpenVZ instance to serve files.
Run Samba 4 binaries in another, separate OpenVZ instance as an AD domain
controller.
...all on the same physical machine?
Hi everyone
I'm setting up a report writing system for a school. All teachers need
rw access to the reports which are in a folder of the same name.
Teachers are in a group called teachers and there is a share called reports:
[reports]
path = /data/reports
read only = No
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 11:27 +0200, steve wrote:
Hi everyone
I'm setting up a report writing system for a school. All teachers need
rw access to the reports which are in a folder of the same name.
Teachers are in a group called teachers and there is a share called reports:
[reports]
This is one of the many reasons why we are working on s3fs. When we are
happy with it, we will make it the default, but until then we can only ask
for your patience, and do not recommend the Samba4 DCs be used as general
file servers (ie, use it only for netlogon and sysvol).
Can we use it
