tcg wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2003 17:43, Carsten Loeffler wrote:
To verify that this is not just a simple tar or whatever problem
tonight from my Linux box I made a "dd" and tried to create
a file larger than 4 gb on my Windows box.
And again I've received "File size limit exceeded"
At that by
On Sunday 23 November 2003 17:43, Carsten Loeffler wrote:
> To verify that this is not just a simple tar or whatever problem
> tonight from my Linux box I made a "dd" and tried to create
> a file larger than 4 gb on my Windows box.
>
> And again I've received "File size limit exceeded"
> At that by
Hi Everyone.
So far: thanks to everyone for the support. I was offline for 2 days,
but tonight I've spent again some time at home on that problem.
My configuration at home is slightly different: I'm using WinXP Pro
instead of W2K Server and I'm using Suse 8.2 instead if Suse
Enterprise Server 8.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, David Morel wrote:
> Le jeu 20/11/2003 à 12:59, Stefan G. Weichinger a écrit :
> > Hello, John H Terpstra,
> >
> > Donnerstag, 20. November 2003, 08:55 you wrote:
> >
> > JHT> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >
> > JHT> I do not want to nit pick, but please n
Le jeu 20/11/2003 à 12:59, Stefan G. Weichinger a écrit :
> Hello, John H Terpstra,
>
> Donnerstag, 20. November 2003, 08:55 you wrote:
>
> JHT> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> JHT> I do not want to nit pick, but please note that smbfs is not samba.
> JHT> smbfs is a kernel
If you're writing to a Windows system, you have to deal with the
limitations of the Windows box's file system, right? Are you running NTFS
or FAT32 on the Windows box? FAT32 has a maximum file size of 4GB that you
would have to contend with.
Terry
>On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:55:51AM +, Joh
As an unrelated, and posibly easy, work-around. Are you able to pipe
the file through the split command as you back it up? Even when I
have everythign working with large files, I find splitting my backup
files at 1GB just makes them easier to work with all around.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:55:5
Hello, John H Terpstra,
Donnerstag, 20. November 2003, 08:55 you wrote:
JHT> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
JHT> I do not want to nit pick, but please note that smbfs is not samba.
JHT> smbfs is a kernel driver in Linux.
Thank you for pointing that out. I am aware of that fact
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I do not want to nit pick, but please note that smbfs is not samba.
smbfs is a kernel driver in Linux.
smbclient is part of Samba. You should be able to use it to backup your
files to a Win2K system and it should not be 2GB limited.
- John T.
>
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mittwoch, 19. November 2003, 17:09 you wrote:
CLcd> Hi Everyone.
CLcd> I'm still having that problem that my samba cannot backup more
CLcd> than 2 GB onto a Windows share (on a Win2K box) (see messages
CLcd> earlier in this forum - I have to backup a 66 GB file out of d
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mittwoch, 19. November 2003, 17:09 you wrote:
CLcd> [2003/11/18 12:41:54, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_connect(782)
CLcd> Error connecting to 20.20.20.1 (No route to host)
CLcd> [2003/11/18 12:41:54, 0] client/smbmount.c:do_connection(150)
CLcd> 161: Connection to ntsr
Hi Everyone.
I'm still having that problem that my samba cannot backup more
than 2 GB onto a Windows share (on a Win2K box) (see messages
earlier in this forum - I have to backup a 66 GB file out of database).
Setting loglevel of SAMBA to "2" I received the following (for the
time running the bac
12 matches
Mail list logo
