-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke wrote:
| On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 05:27:24PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
| We should ask CONTOSO.COM. I'm afraid this is a known
| limitation right now. It could be coded up, but it is not
| yet.
| Volker, This is already done
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:34:40AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
| Oh, I did not see that code. Can you point me at the right
| lines?
Hey Volker,
$ git-log b442644bac2a7d5853440254257ca34a8e7c25de
(SVN r22072).
Okay, thanks!
Volker
pgpPEWSEC5hQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello list,
perhaps someone can guide me, finding out what's going wrong in the
following scenario (Active Directory , Samba 3.0.20b same with 3.0.28a):
CHILD1.CONTOSO.COM -trusts- CONTOSO.COM -trusts-CHILD2.CONTOSO.COM
|| |
User:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Martin Zielinski wrote:
winbind does this with a LSA RPC call to CHILD2 (not to CHILD1, where
the user comes from) and receives a NO MAPPED USER reply.
Now my question is: shouldn't Samba ask CHILD1 for the user
CHILD1\testtest or
should CHILD2 know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Zielinski wrote:
Hello list,
perhaps someone can guide me, finding out what's going wrong in the
following scenario (Active Directory , Samba 3.0.20b same with 3.0.28a):
CHILD1.CONTOSO.COM -trusts- CONTOSO.COM -trusts-CHILD2.CONTOSO.COM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Martin Zielinski wrote:
winbind does this with a LSA RPC call to CHILD2 (not to CHILD1, where
the user comes from) and receives a NO MAPPED USER reply.
Now my question is: shouldn't
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 05:27:24PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
We should ask CONTOSO.COM. I'm afraid this is a known
limitation right now. It could be coded up, but it is not
yet.
Volker, This is already done in 3.2 so I'm guessing you say
we should backport this fix?
Oh, I did
