Thanks! But how is this related to my problem? is there any pitfalls when
some user is a member of many groups? is their uid idepends on their group
membership ?
--
View this message in context:
http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/UID-GID-mapping-consistency-across-at-least-two-Linux-machines-tp45
On 11/04/12 22:35, bakytn wrote:
I have also cleared the /var/run/samba folder and it's now working properly.
you helped a lot! Thank you!
Hi
Just remembered a gotcha with the rfc2307 stuff. Hope you don't mind me
including it here for completeness and to save head scratching.
If the user
I have also cleared the /var/run/samba folder and it's now working properly.
you helped a lot! Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/UID-GID-mapping-consistency-across-at-least-two-Linux-machines-tp4543255p4549992.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailin
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:50 PM, bakytn wrote:
> I tried the old config and newer.
>
> idmap backend = rid:DOMAIN=4000-2
> idmap uid = 4000-2
> idmap gid = 4000-2
Doesn't look right - man smb.conf - for the correct syntax. For your
version I think it should be more like:
idmap
something strange is happening. It's not working at all. Just the same ID's
as before
I tried the old config and newer.
idmap backend = rid:DOMAIN=4000-2
idmap uid = 4000-2
idmap gid = 4000-2
(changed from 2000 to 4000)
Also tried to use:
idmap alloc backend = rid
I rem
On 11/04/12 15:00, John Drescher wrote:
I also only use ldap the same way without any winbind.
For years I used to do that however my domain member servers (not PDCs
/ BDCs) would not enumerate the users correctly for the windows
security tab without using winbind. Does this work for you?
Joh
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:27 PM, bakytn wrote:
> Would you recommend me to use IDMAP_RID with Winbind?
I use it successfully.
> idmap backend = idmap_rid:DOMAIN=2000-1
Depending upon your Samba version the syntax may be a bit different.
idmap config DOMAIN : backend = rid
idmap config
> I also only use ldap the same way without any winbind.
>
For years I used to do that however my domain member servers (not PDCs
/ BDCs) would not enumerate the users correctly for the windows
security tab without using winbind. Does this work for you?
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go t
Hi,
Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:02:09AM +0200, steve napsal(a):
> On 11/04/12 09:09, Daniel Müller wrote:
> >I also only use ldap the same way without any winbind.
> Thanks. I was beginning to wonder if we were the only ones. It seems
> such an easy alternative to using winbind. The uid/gid is _exactl
On 11/04/12 09:09, Daniel Müller wrote:
I also only use ldap the same way without any winbind.
Hi
Thanks. I was beginning to wonder if we were the only ones. It seems
such an easy alternative to using winbind. The uid/gid is _exactly_
wysiwyg. Always. I think this is the sort of consistency th
consistency across at least two Linux
machines
On 09/04/12 21:00, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> On 04/09/12 13:11, bakytn wrote:
>> I found this:
>> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-January/078411.html
>>
>> How to implement "a" scenario?
> Are you using win
Would you recommend me to use IDMAP_RID with Winbind?
I don't have domain trusts (which is required to be "off" when using rid).
It's a small domain with about 300 users at the very maximum.
Also..if I just add
idmap backend = idmap_rid:DOMAIN=2000-1
What would change? Would it mess my
On 10/04/12 18:45, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 04/10/12 12:29, steve wrote:
On 09/04/12 21:00, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 04/09/12 13:11, bakytn wrote:
Winbind mapping should not be necessary on domain controllers, except if
you have domain trusts. I have ldap backend so my LDAP users have b
On 04/10/12 12:29, steve wrote:
> On 09/04/12 21:00, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>> On 04/09/12 13:11, bakytn wrote:
>>> I found this:
>>> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-January/078411.html
>>>
>>> How to implement "a" scenario?
>> Are you using winbind for idmapping? The files you want
On 09/04/12 21:00, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
On 04/09/12 13:11, bakytn wrote:
I found this: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-January/078411.html
How to implement "a" scenario?
Are you using winbind for idmapping? The files you want may be
/var/samba/locks (check "testparm -v" for the l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2012 04:09 PM, bakytn wrote:
> Here ist he global section of my smb.conf:
>
> I am not sure if I am using Winbind (I guess yes).
>
> [global]
>workgroup = DOMAIN
>realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
>preferred master = no
>
>server string
Here ist he global section of my smb.conf:
I am not sure if I am using Winbind (I guess yes).
[global]
workgroup = DOMAIN
realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
preferred master = no
server string = SAMBA
security = ADS
encrypt passwords = yes
log level = 1
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
On 04/09/12 13:11, bakytn wrote:
> I found this: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-January/078411.html
>
> How to implement "a" scenario?
>
> but..how about simpler way...like, may be, running rsync to copy necessary
> fiels from server 1 to server 2.
>
> I could do this..but I don't know w
I found this: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-January/078411.html
How to implement "a" scenario?
but..how about simpler way...like, may be, running rsync to copy necessary
fiels from server 1 to server 2.
I could do this..but I don't know which files to replicate?
--
View this message
I have two SAMBA machines
they both successfully joined to the same Active Directory (actually SAMBA
4)
I have copied the user files from *server 1* to *server 2*
/owner id/ and /group id/s are preserved.
on server 1, when is do: *id user1*
I get *2001*
but on server 2
the same user has differ
20 matches
Mail list logo
