On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 02:05:48AM +0100, Chris Hayes wrote:
>
> Basically, I want to know more about which Samba uses, how much it
> tries to keep the two in sync, etc. For example, a moment ago I
> changed the POSIX ACLs on a file that already had a security.NTACL
> glob in the extended attribut
I have never quite got uid/gid consistency working with member
servers. My domain controllers use an LDAP backend so they don't
have an issue. All the unix uid and gid is also in LDAP. This
keeps file permissions correct on the member servers when accessing from
windows clients. How
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm wondering how essential it is to ensure that Samba User/Group to
UIDs/GIDs mapping across various Samba servers remain consistent.
I realise that Samba uses the extended ACLs and also uses extended
attributes to store blobs of Windows ACL inf
