[Fwd: Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a]

2006-07-25 Thread Michael Gasch
does this explain the behaviour in your case? greez -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Money wrote: > I added the new index, but not the new schema. I > just added that it appears to be working fine > now. Thanks! Great! Thanks for the feedback. cheers, jerry

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Money wrote: > Here's the output from 'net groupmap list verbose': > > Domain Admins > SID : S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041-512 > Unix gid : 512 > Unix group: Domain Admins > Group type: Domain G

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread James Money
Here's the output from 'net groupmap list verbose': Domain Admins SID : S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041-512 Unix gid : 512 Unix group: Domain Admins Group type: Domain Group Comment : Netbios Domain Administrators Domain Users SID

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Money wrote: > I still have the problem with domain groups in 3.0.23a with the patch listed > on the website applied. The 'net rpc info' command shows(still): > > Domain Name: MATH_CS > Domain SID: S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041 > Se

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread James Money
I still have the problem with domain groups in 3.0.23a with the patch listed on the website applied. The 'net rpc info' command shows(still): Domain Name: MATH_CS Domain SID: S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041 Sequence number: 1153750888 Num users: 5 Num domain groups: 0 Num local groups:

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > No. But I have reproduced the error you reported though. > I expect it is specific to ldapsam. Attached is a patch. > For what it's worth, I have no problem running usrmgr.exe > with the one exception noted. I've post

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeroen Vriesman wrote: > And now for the strange thing, when I delete > the group "Users" form ldap, it is automatically > re-created, and adding a group "Users" in the normal > way, with groupmapping doesn't prevent it from being > created. smbd wi

Re: [Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread Jeroen Vriesman
Hi, got the same problem, and there is a "mysterious" group "Users", the usermanager doesn't start, it says "The specified local group does not exist". net groupmap list | tail: IZ ICT (S-1-5-21-2651798370-710026074-3531216960-3179) -> IZ ICT IZ PZ (S-1-5-21-2651798370-710026074-3531216960-318

[Samba] USRMGR and 3.0.23a

2006-07-24 Thread éric le hénaff
hello i cant manage groups with usrmgr and the configuration below debian sarge, samba 3.0.22, openldap 2.2.23, smbldap-tools 0.8.7. usrmgr reports he cant find the groups. is it solved by samba 3.0.23a ? does anybody report enhancement after upgrading to 3.0.23a ? Regards ELH -- Éric LE HÉNAFF