Re: {Disarmed} Re: [Samba] Update: Winbind+nss working on one centOS 5.2 box but not another

2009-01-31 Thread Ben Tisdall
Thanks Kums - I should have been clearer - the non-verbose testparm output (which doesn't show the netbios name) diffs out perfectly. The netbios names are in fact set differently and the join happens without errors. testparm -v Kums wrote: Make sure to have different Netbios Name, else only

Re: [Samba] Update: Winbind+nss working on one centOS 5.2 box but not another

2009-01-26 Thread Kums
Make sure to have different Netbios Name, else only one box will be able to successfully join to AD + export Samba shares. Cheers, -Kums On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Ben Tisdall b...@redcircleit.com wrote: tim clusters wrote: What is your id backend? AD or RID? Can you post your

Re: [Samba] Update: Winbind+nss working on one centOS 5.2 box but not another

2009-01-23 Thread Ben Tisdall
tim clusters wrote: What is your id backend? AD or RID? Can you post your smb.conf? Hi Tim thanks for replying. This is very minimal smb.conf - the history is that it was copied verbatim from a Guardian snap appliance worked perfectly well on 'Box A'. workgroup = OURDOMAIN security = ads

[Samba] Update: Winbind+nss working on one centOS 5.2 box but not another

2009-01-19 Thread Ben Tisdall
Something is not right with the group mapping, but I am unsure what. getent returns different a primary GID for a given user on each box and the group mapping differs in each case: Box A: //u...@host//:~$ getent group 10012 OURDOMAIN\domain users:*:10012: Box B: //u...@host//:~$ getent group