Don't these tests make some presumptions? For instance, Shacky didn't
say that he was attempting to join an active directory domain. In fact,
he has security=User, security=ADS.
I'd like to understand the problem he is having, because I am having the
same one. However, I don't want to be di
2008/5/8 Linux Addict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1. Fix your smb.conf. It seems to be having issues as it shows error.
> testparm again and it shudn't return any errors. Use SWAT if you cant
> the syntax right.
> 2. Join to the domain again and restart smb and winbind.
> 3. wbinfo -t, wbinfo -g, wbinfo
1. Fix your smb.conf. It seems to be having issues as it shows error.
testparm again and it shudn't return any errors. Use SWAT if you cant
the syntax right.
2. Join to the domain again and restart smb and winbind.
3. wbinfo -t, wbinfo -g, wbinfo -u shud return successfull results now.
Let me kn
2008/5/6 Linux Addict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Its okay not to have domain's SID. This is not the reason you are not
> able to login.
Oh, ok, thank you!
> What is the output of
> 1.wbinfo -t
server-x:~# wbinfo -t
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCES
Its okay not to have domain's SID. This is not the reason you are not
able to login.
What is the output of
1.wbinfo -t
2.wbinfo -g
3.testparm
4.net ads info
5.kinit
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:41 AM, shacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I realized that I have a problem with the users SID
Hi.
I realized that I have a problem with the users SID.
Thy are different between the SID of the domain.
Let's see the output of these commands:
server:/home/utenti/user# net getlocalsid
SID for domain SERVER is: S-1-5-21-1375271547-2371556575-3111006354
server:/home/utenti/user# pdbedit -Lv te
