Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 03:41:18PM -0500, blfs wrote:
OK, so I go to this page:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/enter_bug.cgi
Now what?
Samba 2.2 is not listed.
We are not accepting bugs against Samba 2.2 unless
they are security problems. Samba2.x is no longer
actively
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 03:41:18PM -0500, blfs wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: blfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Verified bug in Woody Samba
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
blfs wrote:
| OK, so I go to this page:
|
| https://bugzilla.samba.org/enter_bug.cgi
|
| Now what?
|
| Samba 2.2 is not listed.
Sorry. Thought you were on 3.0. There is no further
development going on for the 2.2 branch. If you can reproduce
this
I have spent the last week trying to figure out
why the command
smbclient -L win98server
kept crapping out. After grepping through the
source code, I figured out the error was in
gethostbyname(I think).
The solution to this problem is running the
command
smbclient -L win98server -R bcast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
blfs wrote:
| How do I go about reporting this error? I would also
| not mind taking the time to reprogram the code to fix
| this one bug, since it took me a week of frustration to
| find it.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN
I have spent the last week trying to figure out
why the command
smbclient -L win98server
kept crapping out. After grepping through the
source code, I figured out the error was in
gethostbyname(I think).
The solution to this problem is running the
command
smbclient -L win98server -R bcast
