Andrew Masterson wrote:
hide unreadable = yes
is the closest I can think of. You could then set perms to something
like 400 and only owners will be able to read their own files.
-=Andrew
Thank you, Andrew.
Changing the perms is not the solution. This is what I want to do:
I have a public
option will help. Maybe a different way to
approach the problem. YMMV
-=Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Allen Chen [mailto:ac...@harbourfrontcentre.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:40 AM
To: Andrew Masterson
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Veto files question
Andrew
: Allen Chen [mailto:ac...@harbourfrontcentre.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:40 AM
To: Andrew Masterson
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Veto files question
Andrew Masterson wrote:
hide unreadable = yes
is the closest I can think of. You could then set perms to something
: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:35 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Veto files question
Hi, there
I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf:
Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a
shared folder?
If not, how do we implement this functionality in Samba
Hi, there
I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf:
Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a
shared folder?
If not, how do we implement this functionality in Samba?
Thanks,
Allen
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 09:34 -0400, Allen Chen wrote:
Hi, there
I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf:
Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a
shared folder?
No, AFAIK, veto files just match the name of the file to some pattern;
it doesn't concern itself
