Hi samba team,
, We have recently moved samba to 4.0.7 since then acl are not working when
we try to set any deny permission from windows hosts. The error is as shown
below in log.smbd
>>
[2013/08/21 02:49:36.322907, 0]
../source3/smbd/posix_acls.c:1814(add_current_ace_to_acl)
add_current_
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 15:56 +0400, Александр Свиридов wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In samba 3 we used create mask , force create.. to set file
> permisions. In samba 4 as I understand those options are ignored and
> default acls are used instead. But, is it possible to set by default
> different permi
Hello!
In samba 3 we used create mask , force create.. to set file permisions. In
samba 4 as I understand those options are ignored and default acls are used
instead. But, is it possible to set by default different permisions on files
and folders? For example on folders rwx, and on file
Version 4.0.5-GIT-9ec44d4
Single DC and fileserver running the samba binary.
Hi
I have a share called shared:
[shared]
path = /home/shared
read only = No
I set the ACL:
setfacl -R -m g:staff:rw,d:g:staff:rw /home/shared
This is what it looks like:
getfacl shared
# file: shared
#
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:52 +0100, Alexander Födisch wrote:
> When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective
> read-only:
>
> ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx
> # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx
> # owner: root
> # group: 11816
> user::r
When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective
read-only:
~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx
# file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx
# owner: root
# group: 11816
user::rwx
user:11582:rwx#effective:r--
group::rwx#
On 1/10/13, Alex Matthews wrote:
> Comparing the two ACLs
>
> O:LAG:DUD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED)
> O:DAG:DUD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01f
Hi all,
Some (then all) of our workstations were complaining about incorrect
ACLs on GPOs and were unable to read the gpt.ini to apply the GPOs.
So I did a sysvolcheck and sure enough I'd lost the ACLs when I moved
our sysvol share to a new location on the server (whoops, mea culpa).
I ran a
At first, has your file system already enabled xattr?
For example, are following commands successfull?
# touch test.txt
# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt
# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt
# getfattr -d test.txt
# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt
And your Samba
From: Dmitry Mordovin
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:39:44 +0400
> Now, when I try to Apply hidden attribute, popup message - Error change
> file attributes. Access Denied.
At first, has your file system already enabled xattr?
For example, are following commands successfull?
# touch test.txt
# se
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store Windows ACLs, need only DOS attrs (hidden file attr).
What Is enough to add to my smb.conf?
'store dos attributes (S) or 'map hidden (S)' or together or else?
I use:
store dos attributes = yes
map readonly = no
map system = no
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:17:21PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
>
> >>Added to global section
> >>
> >>vfs objects = acl_xattr
> >>
> >>
> >>No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
> >You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
> >
> >Have you tried using setfattr on
Added to global section
vfs objects = acl_xattr
No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
Have you tried using setfattr on that filesystem ? Does it work ?
Jeremy.
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:36:51PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 04:26 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> >On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
> >
> >[SNIP]
> >
> >>Samba config:
> >>
> >>[global]
> >>workgroup = HOME
> >>security = share
> >>max log size = 1024
> >
On 12/09/2011 04:26 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
Samba config:
[global]
workgroup = HOME
security = share
max log size = 1024
store dos attributes = yes
map archive = no
map read only = no
map hidden = no
map system = no
create m
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
> Samba config:
>
> [global]
> workgroup = HOME
> security = share
> max log size = 1024
> store dos attributes = yes
> map archive = no
> map read only = no
> map hidden = no
> map system = no
> create mode = 777
> directory mode
Hello All!
Can't make Samba use acl and extended user attributes to save DOS file
attributes.
Please, help me configure properly.
My steps on Windows XP:
1 - Open share
2 - Open property of file 1122/22.bmp
3 - Check file attribute: hidden
4 - Click Apply
5 - Click Close
6 - Open property ag
I added :
acl check permissions = False
veto oplock files = /*.doc/*.docx/*.xls/*.xlsx/*.pptx/*.ppsx/*.ppt/*.pps
but still doesn't work.
*
> Dear All,
>
> I have problem with this smb.conf share section
> (I'm not samba admin, but I know this configuration)
>
> smb.con
> Auftrag von alberto.atz...@ext.jrc.ec.europa.eu
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2011 10:37
> An: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: [Samba] ACL with ActiveDirectory@Groups
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I'm new on this group.Greetings to all.
> I have problem with thi
---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von alberto.atz...@ext.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Oktober 2011 10:37
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] ACL with
Dear All,
I'm new on this group.Greetings to all.
I have problem with this smb.conf share section
(I'm not samba admin, but I know this configuration)
smb.conf 3.5.8
###
[AD-test-acl]
comment = AD-test-acl
path = /fs-e/AD/group/AD-test-acl
read only = No
From: Oliver Guerino
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:29:44 -0300
> What happened is the following:
> My network has windows and linux clients, the permissions described above
> operates normally with the windows client, but when I try to connect
> with the linux client does not operates.
As far as I ex
Hello,
I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment.
I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is
Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47.
Below my configurations files:
#/etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1
#smb.conf
[data]
comment
Hello,
I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment.
I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is
Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47.
Below my configurations files:
#/etc/fstab
/dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1
#smb.conf
[data]
comment
Hi all,
I have 2 problems :-(
Im running debian kernel 2.6.32 samba 3.5.6.
i upgraded my samba from 3.2.4 to 3.5.6
now i have the following problems.
When i want to set my rights on a folder i get "access denied"
this was working ok with the 3.2.4 version.
fstab has acl,user_xattr on the
Using Samba+winbind 3.3.8 as a fileserver on a Win2008 domain. getent
and wbinfo is reporting correct informations about users. However, my
groups directories are allowing people who shouldn't .. From the shell
everything is working as expected, but not from samba.. What did I
miss !?
Exported sha
2011/2/4 Zorg :
> I have an issue with samba+acl and Windows checkbox "Replace all Child
> object permissions" .
>
> I have a folder with defaults ACLs :
>
> /default:user:user1:rwx,
> default:user:user2:rwx
> owned by user1/
>
> On Windows if I'm c
I have an issue with samba+acl and Windows checkbox "Replace all Child
object permissions" .
I have a folder with defaults ACLs :
/default:user:user1:rwx,
default:user:user2:rwx
owned by user1/
On Windows if I'm checking "Replace all Child object permissions with
inh
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:26:10AM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Dear Jeremy and samba team ,
>
> This is suresh from EMC.I am having samba 3.4.8 on my NAS with posix acls
> support.
>
>
>
> When a backup software backs up files and folders, it typically backs up the
> securit
Dear Jeremy and samba team ,
This is suresh from EMC.I am having samba 3.4.8 on my NAS with posix acls
support.
When a backup software backs up files and folders, it typically backs up the
security settings on the files/folders
too. Then during restore, the software will try to restore th
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
>> Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba
>> which got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that
>> ACL suppo
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:52:46PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Thanks this helps.
Let me know if you really need the "first version with ACL
support" and I'll track it down.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.sa
Thanks this helps.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; j...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
> got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
> support.
>
> Can you please confirm on this?.
Oh yes, we've had
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
support.
Can you please confirm on this?.
Thanks
Suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: ht
I am running a Samba Box as a Domain Member in a Windows ADS Domain (Windows
Server 2003). The Box has joined the ADS domain and the kerberos authentication
works, I can see "smbd" processes running with AD user accounts.
But I can not set ACLs on the directories or the files located on the share
On 10-10-01 05:56 AM, Mauro Destro - Impel Systems Srl wrote:
I'm trying to setup a simple standalone Samba server in a win2k
network without domain.
I've followed some basic howto on the net, users can see shares and
can save, modify and delete files and folders.
My big problem is the secu
up assigned)
2. join your PC to the domain.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Mauro Destro - Impel Systems Srl
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 5:57 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] ACL from win2k doesn'
I'm trying to setup a simple standalone Samba server in a win2k
network without domain.
I've followed some basic howto on the net, users can see shares and can
save, modify and delete files and folders.
My big problem is the security tab: i can't add any user because the
screen where i can
10 9:13 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: smb...@chrissmith.org; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:40AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Thanks smith for the quick reply. what
Thanks Smith. This explains in detail.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Chris Smith [mailto:smb...@chrissmith.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:19 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:40AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
> Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
> source code prevent the changing setting rw access to "test_subfolder" user1
> , since he has only read only access on the share "test".
The pro
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:04 PM, wrote:
> it looks like code is not designed like this.
>
> if you don't mind , Can you please explain this ,
>
> --
> - although you would be asking
> it to restrict the admin's rights, which wouldn't be proper behavior.
> Plus it then wouldn't work like a
sts.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:24 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, wrote:
> Thanks smith for the q
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, wrote:
> Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
> source code prevent the changing setting rw access to "test_subfolder" user1
> , since he has only read only access on the share "test".
I suppose you could patch it to do so -
ba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:25 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> Share level security will take precedence over
> file level security when connected via the share.
Sorry about that: more accurate would be to state that the most
restrictive security permissions will be active. If share level
permissions allo
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM, wrote:
> 1) created share "test" given read and write access to the user "admin" and
> read only access to user "user1".
>
> 2) from my windows PC logged into the samba share "test " with "admin" user
> . created subfolder in that "test_subfolder".
>
> 3) on th
@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict user
security setting
Dear friends, I am having following issue on my samba device . Please help me
on this.
1) created share "test" given read and write access to the user "admin" and
Dear friends, I am having following issue on my samba device . Please help me
on this.
1) created share "test" given read and write access to the user "admin" and
read only access to user "user1".
2) from my windows PC logged into the samba share "test " with "admin" user .
created subfolder
Dear friends,
I am facing the problem while adding the ACL user into subfolder security
permissions from some of the WORKGROUPS PCs . While adding the ACL user itself
it is asking for samba login credentials ( I did not notice this behavior in
other PC's ) and after entering it, it is displ
Dear samba team,
Please help me on the below issue.
I have connected a samba share from my device to my windows XP
machine . that samba share has ACL support enabled .
1) The shared folder names is "user1" and the user name I logged into
samba share is also user1.
2) I have created
Hello,
when I try to add a group to the list of groups that can access a
director I get a message in windows and my samba log file contains this
lines
[2010/08/16 12:15:13.495938, 0]
modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix)
smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist u
> > I have recently commissioned a box running RHEL5.4 and samba sernet
> > 3.5.2 that is AD integrated.
> >
> > The other shares on the box seem to obey the "inherit acls" and
"inherit
> > permissions" flags as well as "force create mode" and "force
directory
> > mode", but not on the _homes_ di
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:37:37AM -0600, Andrew Masterson wrote:
> I have recently commissioned a box running RHEL5.4 and samba sernet
> 3.5.2 that is AD integrated.
>
> The other shares on the box seem to obey the "inherit acls" and "inherit
> permissions" flags as well as "force create mode" a
I have recently commissioned a box running RHEL5.4 and samba sernet
3.5.2 that is AD integrated.
The other shares on the box seem to obey the "inherit acls" and "inherit
permissions" flags as well as "force create mode" and "force directory
mode", but not on the _homes_ directory.
Has anyone exp
Hello list,
I'm having a "fun" time trying to figure out my ACL problems.
I've gone through the default ACL settings and the mask settings on
the filesystem to ensure that the user I am using does indeed have
access to the filesystem that is being shared out.
My issue is that I am unable to overwr
2010/4/3 grant little wrote:
> Upgrade to 3.5.1 (or 2 real soon)...
I tried sernet lenny 3.4 packages and no ACL bug.
So it's something related to lenny-backports packages.
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Quartexx wrote:
>>
>> >After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to
>After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny
>with a backport of 2:3.4.5~dfsg-1 (with libtalloc2 2.0.1-1), i get a
>fully working service but with a strange ACL bug : people can
>create/delete/rename files, but not modify them (error "espace
>insuffisant pour traiter cette c
Hello,
After upgrading from Debian Etch with samba 3.0.24-6etch10 to Lenny
with a backport of 2:3.4.5~dfsg-1 (with libtalloc2 2.0.1-1), i get a
fully working service but with a strange ACL bug : people can
create/delete/rename files, but not modify them (error "espace
insuffisant pour tra
I'm trying to use samba to share some files with ACL.
But when i create a new folder or file, I have to press F5 before I can see any
change on the folder.
For example:
I create a new folder on a directory. But I can´t see it until i press F5
Someone knows how to fix it?
Acabo de compartir una
All my fault. I forget to execute "make clean" before compiling samba
with ACL support.
--
Shaochun Wang(王绍春)
PH.D Candidate
State Key Laboratory of Computer Science,
Institute of Software,
Chinese Academy of Sciences
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
Hi, all
It seems that samba-3.4.1 still has something wrong with ACL for
open-for-delete operation. I give a group of users full access, which
means rwx permission, to a directory and make this as the default ACL
for this directory. Then I found that I can do anthing as a member of
that group but
On Friday 18 September 2009 02:06:41 pm Miguel Medalha wrote:
> Please pardon me if I insist, but I am doing it with the interest of the
> community in mind, not just bitching about it.
>
>
>
> I really don't see why this could not be implemented. Perhaps it goes
> somewhat against established
Please pardon me if I insist, but I am doing it with the interest of the
community in mind, not just bitching about it.
I understand that if you address the problem of full compatibility with
Windows ACLs you risk to break compatibility with other clients, such as
NFS clients. Yet, in numerous
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:01:21PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>>> All files/dirs are 666 or 777. According to my reading, since there
>>> are no POSIX extended ACLs, if the VFS layer "passes" an access, then
>>> it only should be compared against the standard UGO permissions.
>>>
>>
>>
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 06:01:21 pm Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
> I am ignorant enough on these low-level matters. I "almost" understand
> your statement. But... consider the following:
>
> - At the filesystem level ALL the permissions are 666 or 777
> - The above are ONLY seen by the VFS lay
All files/dirs are 666 or 777. According to my reading, since there are
no POSIX extended ACLs, if the VFS layer "passes" an access, then it only
should be compared against the standard UGO permissions.
That's correct - but the problem isn't access, it's when the
incoming ACL is "set" o
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:20:11PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
> All files/dirs are 666 or 777. According to my reading, since there are
> no POSIX extended ACLs, if the VFS layer "passes" an access, then it only
> should be compared against the standard UGO permissions.
That's correct - but
Dear Jeremy
Since I once thought about doing the same, I would like to know your
views on the method that Wes describes.
I quote:
»
What I've been doing, which is dangerous but effective, is setting
file creation mode to 666 and letting the Samba VFS ACL layer take care of
everything. That
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:38:13PM -0400, Wes Deviers wrote:
>
> Or, alternately, "Does Samba, with vfs object = acl_xattr, store ACLs both as
> a user_xattr AND an ext3 ACL at the same time?" My limited testing shows
> that
> *not* to be the case, but I'm certainly not the expert.
Yes it doe
I'm clear through this part.
Where I'm confused is that on a machine that I do have working, there is no
POSIX ACL support, but the Samba VFS layer works brilliantly. Inheritance,
take ownership, everything works on the VFS layer without needing any POSIX
ACLs.
On the "old" serve
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:18:58AM -0400, Wes Deviers wrote:
> List,
>
> I had Samba 3.0 running on Debian Lenny configured to use POSIX ACLs on ext3.
>
> They worked fine, or at least as fine as NT -> POSIX mapping ever did. After
> testing 3.3 with acl_xattr on using a different machine, I
List,
I had Samba 3.0 running on Debian Lenny configured to use POSIX ACLs on ext3.
They worked fine, or at least as fine as NT -> POSIX mapping ever did. After
testing 3.3 with acl_xattr on using a different machine, I decided to give it a
whirl on the production server. And yes, I know it'
Hello everybody,
I'm currently using samba with complete ACL support and windows domain
integration.
This work fine, but i've a question regarding "special permission". On
windows, when you take a look to the security tab for a directory (not
file), you see all effective permission trough "special
Harry Jede wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. April 2009 15:33 schrieb David Vaz:
>
>> I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
>> with acl support.
>>
>> The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it
>> in different machines.
>>
>> In a given share, user
On Fri, March 13, 2009 11:07, Christos Karaviotis wrote:
> On Wed, March 11, 2009 14:26, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>> I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
>>> problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
>>> working and everyone have ful
Am Montag, 27. April 2009 15:33 schrieb David Vaz:
> I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
> with acl support.
>
> The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it
> in different machines.
>
> In a given share, user "A" is the owner of the folder
I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
with acl support.
The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it in
different machines.
In a given share, user "A" is the owner of the folder "test", inside
this folder there is a office file "test.doc" fo
On Wed, March 11, 2009 14:26, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
>> problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
>> working and everyone have full access everywhere even if they are not in
>> the acl.
>> If
> I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
> problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
> working and everyone have full access everywhere even if they are not in
> the acl.
> If I try to add them and restrict them only to read and execute t
Hi list,
This is my first post and I hope I will not make people mad as this may
have been answered before.
Here it goes.
I am running Samba for some years now (3 years) and had absolutely no
problems. For the last month on one of the machines the NT ACL stopped
working and everyone have full a
Is that the only option? We've noticed the same behavior of osx clients
recently, but we also have linux clients connecting and I don't wish to
degrade the experience by disabling unix extensions.
What is effect of disabling unix extensions? At least with it acls work
on OSX too.
--
Eero
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:19:19 James Peach wrote:
> 2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen :
> > I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
> >
> > Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
> > says access denied to every directory th
2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen :
> I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
>
> Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard says
> access denied to every directory that is using acl.
>
> Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
says access denied to every directory that is using acl.
Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl or is this OSX
bug? Is there any solution on OSX that
[mailto:samba-bounces+clinton=hitcents@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of
Collen Blijenberg
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:01 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] ACL
Did you also setup ACL in your fstab ??
the mounted partition needs acl to make samba use it.
Cheers, Collen
Clinton
over and cannot find clear instructions on how to set ACL
up in a user environment. If you could point me to one of these documents
that would be very helpful.
We currently have Samba setup to work without a domain. I have read on other
websites that this is not a good idea:
One problem
be very helpful.
We currently have Samba setup to work without a domain. I have read on other
websites that this is not a good idea:
One problem with Samba ACL support is that listing users to use for access
control entries (ACEs) within ACLs can be troublesome. Specifically, if
you'
Hello
I have a problem with POSIX ACLs. I have created a directory with these
ACLs:
> getfacl .
# file: .
# owner: testuser
# group: tls
user::rwx
group::rwx
group:ptls:r-x
mask::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
default:group::rwx
default:group:tls:rwx
default:group:ptls:r-x
default:mask::rwx
def
dear all
i am using winbind for samba authentication. I just want to know
does acl permission can be reset only by root and owner of file/folder ?.
does any way to allow domain admins to reset acl of any file/folder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instruct
dear all
i am using samba 3.0.28-0 on EL5.2 with winbind that get users and group
window 2003 active directory (native mode).
i implemented acl for user and group permission. What i want that regardless
of file/folder group owner, member of AD 'domain admins ' can change acl of
any file/folder.
T
Hello
I am using samba 3.2.1 version on centos 5.2 with ldap. Everything is working
fine as i expected. I have shared a share , say , NOA on samba server.
Now i log into windows and access the share and tried to give rights on share
by right click > properties > security . I want to give a grou
Does anyone have a guide / howto that allows the setup of ACL's the
works with the windows security tab.
Or any advice on the above, am I wasting my time trying to make it work
with the security tab in windows explorer?
Many Thanks
Keith
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
>
> security = ads
> passdb backend = tdbsam
>
>
> password server = server01.mydomain.local
> realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL
> idmap uid = 16777216-33554431
> idmap gid = 16777216-33554431
> template shell = /bin/bash
> winbind use default domain = yes
> winbind enum users = yes
> obey pam restric
John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Keith Sudbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am attempting to configure AC:L's I have enabled it in smb.conf for my
share and remounted my fs with acl enabled. However if I attempt to edit
security permissions for the group "Domain
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Keith Sudbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am attempting to configure AC:L's I have enabled it in smb.conf for my
> share and remounted my fs with acl enabled. However if I attempt to edit
> security permissions for the group "Domain Users" it creates
Hi Guys,
I am attempting to configure AC:L's I have enabled it in smb.conf for my
share and remounted my fs with acl enabled. However if I attempt to edit
security permissions for the group "Domain Users" it creates two more
group "CREATOR GROUP" and "CREATOR OWNER" and refreshes the security
Hello,
I've setup a samba PDC (3.0.31) and I am using Windows Vista clients.
Logging on works fine using roaming profiles and folder redirections.
I am also able to write to shares, etc.
Now I am trying to get the advanced permissions on files to work. So
on my share:
[share]
comment = S
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17:10PM +0100, Keith Sudbury wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a windows 2003 SBS handling domain logins, I also have an Ubuntu
> machine being used as a file server this is using winbind and is on the
> domain I can chown dirs etc with Active Directory users.
>
> However
1 - 100 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
