On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 13:31 -0500, Derek Werthmuller wrote:
> Ok I see it appears that the ldap entries that samba needs in the directory
> are under a different O. ou=groups,o=smb,dc=unav,dc=es for example.
> dn: cn=Domain Admins,ou=groups,o=smb,dc=unav,dc=es
> objectClass: posixGroup
> objectClas
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 19:31 +0100, LiPi - wrote:
> Despite that RID!=GID, mappings between samba rids and groups must be
> there if you want the server to act as a PDC. If there are some GID's
> mapped to i.e. RID 512, and these GID is used by another group, then
> there will be a conflict.
No, be
Despite that RID!=GID, mappings between samba rids and groups must be
there if you want the server to act as a PDC. If there are some GID's
mapped to i.e. RID 512, and these GID is used by another group, then
there will be a conflict.
I had this problem one week ago, when I was trying to give perm
, March 24, 2009 1:38 PM
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] gidNumber's and ldap backed samba PDC
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:10 -0500, Derek Werthmuller wrote:
> In the planning process for migrating from NT4 PDC, and external ldap
> directory to samba 3.2.8 PDC.
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:10 -0500, Derek Werthmuller wrote:
> In the planning process for migrating from NT4 PDC, and external ldap
> directory to samba 3.2.8 PDC. The external existing openldap directory is
> used currently to support the local uid mapping for the Linux logins and
> samba file ser
In the planning process for migrating from NT4 PDC, and external ldap
directory to samba 3.2.8 PDC. The external existing openldap directory is
used currently to support the local uid mapping for the Linux logins and
samba file servers that are members of the current NT4 PDC.
While looking at the
