We mount most of our share though samba but I a server that has the home
directory mounted though nfs. The ID mappings are not the same. The
server is joined to the domain. The domain has 2 samba4 servers and one
win2k8r2 server. The 2 servers in question are CentOS 5.9 x86_64 and
samba 3.6.19
Two small Samba sites, same OS and Samba version;
Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.5 (squeeze)
Samba 3.56
Joined via OpenVPN. (yes I am aware of problems with that. Just made a
fragmentation/MTU change that made a huge difference)
I have set these sites up separately with tdbasm and then joined with a
domai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg,
That may work for you as well, but I was actually referring to:
idmap backend = hash
That should be available in 3.5.4.
Robert
On 08/24/2010 11:10 AM, Greg Dickie wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for the response. You are referring to
>
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the response. You are referring to
idmap backend = rid
correct?
Greg
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 09:10 -0400, Robert Freeman-Day wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have been the most happy with the hash idmap. It really is the least
> invasive a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been the most happy with the hash idmap. It really is the least
invasive and "just works" (does that need to be trademarked these
days?). Since it hashes the SID with the same algorithm, all members
get the same UID/GID mappings, which is a bi
Hi,
Today I'm trying to debug a problem on samba 3.5.4 where a domain
member server is having trouble mapping UIDs to SIDs. I must admit I
never really looked at this before as everything seemed to "just work".
Today I discovered that idmap backend on the PDC and the member server
were both defa
Hey all,
I got a unique requirement of having AD groups map over to unix gid and
existing perms of Unix only groups being granted. Reading through the man
pages it seems this can be accomplished via idmap_nss. So my config looks like:
[global]
workgroup = SKUNKTEST
realm = SKUNKTEST.LOC
Hey all,
I'm having some trouble figuring out ID mapping between AD and LDAP. Basically
I've done what is described in this doc:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba%2C_Active_Directory_%26_LDAP
because it comes very close what I need. Only Samba is aware of AD and because
uids are kept ali
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2006 06:26 AM, jools escreveu:
> Hi All,
>
> I have samba 3.0.23 running on Ubuntu and have a problem with ID maps.
>
> When viewing file permissions on the PDC (Samba 3.0.20/Redhat EL4) Win
> XP resolves the SID/RID to NT user and group nam
Hi All,
I have samba 3.0.23 running on Ubuntu and have a problem with ID maps.
When viewing file permissions on the PDC (Samba 3.0.20/Redhat EL4) Win
XP resolves the SID/RID to NT user and group names. With the Ubuntu
mamber server however, it shows only the SID. I checked that the user
and group
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:50 +0100, Dan Am wrote:
> Hello,
> our task is to get Samba to us the same Mapping as SFU is using in AD.
> 1. In 3.0.21pre1 we set
>
> idmap uid = 5-10
> idmap gid = 5-10
> idmap backend = AD
> winbind separator = =
>
> but mapping a drive from Win2003 Se
Hello,
our task is to get Samba to us the same Mapping as SFU is using in AD.
1. In 3.0.21pre1 we set
idmap uid = 5-10
idmap gid = 5-10
idmap backend = AD
winbind separator = =
but mapping a drive from Win2003 Server fails with:
"nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
us
Hello,
our task is to get Samba to us the same Mapping as SFU is using in AD.
1. In 3.0.21pre1 we set
idmap uid = 5-10
idmap gid = 5-10
idmap backend = AD
winbind separator = =
but mapping a drive from Win2003 Server fails with:
"nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
us
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Craig White wrote:
> as long as I'm showing my ignorance here...the How-to doesn't exactly
> make this clear to me, I'm not all that bright...
>
> It would appear that if using LDAP and authentication for PAM is
> properly working and that all of the uid/cn's and other necessa
as long as I'm showing my ignorance here...the How-to doesn't exactly
make this clear to me, I'm not all that bright...
It would appear that if using LDAP and authentication for PAM is
properly working and that all of the uid/cn's and other necessary fields
for objectclass for both sambaSamAccount
15 matches
Mail list logo
