Would anyone have an idea why a group listing returned
by wbinfo would be different from the one returned by the
native groups command?
Also, it turns out that the listing from wbinfo is incorrect.
Has anyone else seen this before? I'm running 3.0.20b with
my machine in an NT 4.0 domain.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Strebel, Franz R. wrote:
| Would anyone have an idea why a group listing returned
| by wbinfo would be different from the one returned by the
| native groups command?
|
| Also, it turns out that the listing from wbinfo is incorrect.
|
| Has anyone