Re: [Samba] log level and testparm lies

2013-05-09 Thread Dave Pawson
On 10 May 2013 02:17, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 23:41 +0200, Thomas Bork wrote: >> Am 09.05.2013 07:35, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >> >> > The issue is that testparm forces the log level to ensure the warnings >> > are output. >> >> Thanks for the clarification. >> Must be new, ne

Re: [Samba] log level and testparm lies

2013-05-09 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 23:41 +0200, Thomas Bork wrote: > Am 09.05.2013 07:35, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > The issue is that testparm forces the log level to ensure the warnings > > are output. > > Thanks for the clarification. > Must be new, never had difficulties before with old samba versions.

Re: [Samba] log level and testparm lies

2013-05-09 Thread Thomas Bork
Am 09.05.2013 07:35, Andrew Bartlett wrote: The issue is that testparm forces the log level to ensure the warnings are output. Thanks for the clarification. Must be new, never had difficulties before with old samba versions. -- der tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL

[Samba] log level and testparm lies

2013-05-08 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 03:22 +0200, Thomas Bork wrote: > Am 08.05.2013 11:18, schrieb Karolin Seeger: > > > Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.15 include: > > How is the 'log level' in 3.6.15 defined? > But now: > referencetest26 # testparm -vs 2>/dev/null | grep 'log level' > log level = 2