On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
> From: Mark Saad
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:03:53 -0500
>
>> I am working on upgrading a older Samba 3.0.16 setup that uses
>> openldap as its back-end for passwords and users.
>> I built a clone of our setup using CentOS 5.6 and Ope
From: Mark Saad
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:03:53 -0500
> I am working on upgrading a older Samba 3.0.16 setup that uses
> openldap as its back-end for passwords and users.
> I built a clone of our setup using CentOS 5.6 and Openldap 2.4.20 ,
> with Samba 3.6.1 .
>
> My issue.
>
> After success
Hello List
I am working on upgrading a older Samba 3.0.16 setup that uses
openldap as its back-end for passwords and users.
I built a clone of our setup using CentOS 5.6 and Openldap 2.4.20 ,
with Samba 3.6.1 .
My issue.
After successfully building and install Samba users can not
authenticate t
thanks all for your reply
i've tried this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -v -u nicola | grep must
Password must change: Fri, 13 Dec 1901 21:45:51 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# smbpasswd nicola
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -v -u nicola | grep must
Password must
En/na nik600 ha escrit:
On 12/23/05, Alessandro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 1003089564
# smbpasswd storm
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
# pdbedit -v -u storm | grep must
Password must change: mar, 06 ott 2037 18:38:54 GMT
hmm... i've tri
s.
Can someone help me?
Thanks a lot
Luiz
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em
> nome de Alessandro
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2005 18:47
> Para: nik600
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Assunto: Re: [Samba] maxim
em with
> any Microsoft patch, but I updated my samba to version 3.0.21
> and the problem persists.
> Can someone help me?
> Thanks a lot
>
> Luiz
>
>
> > -Mensagem original-
> > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Em nome de
> &g
On 12/23/05, Alessandro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> nik600 wrote:
> > On 12/19/05, simo wrote:
> >
> >> On lun, 2005-12-19 at 13:37 +0100, nik600 wrote:
> >>
> >>> i've tried to set the maximum age of passwords with:
> >>>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 8035200
>
nik600 wrote:
On 12/19/05, simo wrote:
On lun, 2005-12-19 at 13:37 +0100, nik600 wrote:
i've tried to set the maximum age of passwords with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 8035200
account policy value for maximum password age was 8035200
account policy value
On 12/19/05, simo wrote:
>
> On lun, 2005-12-19 at 13:37 +0100, nik600 wrote:
> > i've tried to set the maximum age of passwords with:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 8035200
> > account policy value for maximum password age was 8035200
> > account policy value for
On lun, 2005-12-19 at 13:37 +0100, nik600 wrote:
> i've tried to set the maximum age of passwords with:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 8035200
> account policy value for maximum password age was 8035200
> account policy value for maximum password age is now 8035200
i've tried to set the maximum age of passwords with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 8035200
account policy value for maximum password age was 8035200
account policy value for maximum password age is now 8035200
but if try to see the accounts with: pdbedit -L -v
i get t
12 matches
Mail list logo
