Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-10 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 11:42 +0200, Collen Blijenberg wrote: > Is the mod_ntlm_winbind already apache 2.XX ready ?? > or is it still written for the 1.3.XX version ? A team assembled to build an apache 2.0 version, but it's been ported yet. The closest we have is: http://source.grep.no/ however t

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-10 Thread Collen Blijenberg
Is the mod_ntlm_winbind already apache 2.XX ready ?? or is it still written for the 1.3.XX version ? Collen Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:34 -0600, Todd Garrison wrote: Hello, I have setup mod_ntlm_winbind Firstly, I presume this is the version from lorikeet SVN? to pro

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-05 Thread Todd Garrison
Thanks Ed, It might be related - but the problems happen on both SSL and non-SSL connections. I do get the feeling that there have been a bunch of similar bugs (features?) in IE6. I guess since it only happens when using NTLM auth it really can't be called a bug since there is no actual protocol s

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-05 Thread Ed Plese
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:34:22PM -0600, Todd Garrison wrote: > I have setup mod_ntlm_winbind to provide authentication for an Apache > 1.3.33 webserver running on Fedora Core 3. The authentication works, > but I have run into a problem when using Internet Explorer. > > It seems that the problem

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-05 Thread Todd Garrison
Ha! Nevermind, that messes other things up . . . at least I tried. On 10/5/05, Todd Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > The patch you commited to SVN seems to be working, but I ran into > another problem when dealing with 302 redirects, similar circumstance. > I played with the co

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-05 Thread Todd Garrison
Hi Andrew, The patch you commited to SVN seems to be working, but I ran into another problem when dealing with 302 redirects, similar circumstance. I played with the code a little and found something that seems to work, but I probably just opened a gaping security hole? Here is a diff from SVN . .

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-03 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 15:34 -0600, Todd Garrison wrote: > > Firstly, I presume this is the version from lorikeet SVN? > > Correct. > > > So, I think the issue might be that apache is not handling the NTLM > > authentication request to the module, but we would need to see more > > server-side logs

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-03 Thread Todd Garrison
> Firstly, I presume this is the version from lorikeet SVN? Correct. > So, I think the issue might be that apache is not handling the NTLM > authentication request to the module, but we would need to see more > server-side logs and a real (uncensored, unfortunately) packet capture. I could get y

Re: [Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-03 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:34 -0600, Todd Garrison wrote: > Hello, > > I have setup mod_ntlm_winbind Firstly, I presume this is the version from lorikeet SVN? > to provide authentication for an Apache > 1.3.33 webserver running on Fedora Core 3. The authentication works, > but I have run into a p

[Samba] mod_ntlm_winbind on Apache vs. IE6, no POST method

2005-10-03 Thread Todd Garrison
Hello, I have setup mod_ntlm_winbind to provide authentication for an Apache 1.3.33 webserver running on Fedora Core 3. The authentication works, but I have run into a problem when using Internet Explorer. It seems that the problem might be with Internet Explorer itself, but here is what I think