On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:11:39PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 10/22/2009 12:07 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:33:28AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> >
> >> Hi there
> >>
> >> I recall in times past that when a locked file on a Windows server was
> >> accessed by smbfs, y
On 10/22/2009 12:07 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:33:28AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
>
>> Hi there
>>
>> I recall in times past that when a locked file on a Windows server was
>> accessed by smbfs, you received a kind of "text file busy" type error
>> under Linux. However,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:33:28AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I recall in times past that when a locked file on a Windows server was
> accessed by smbfs, you received a kind of "text file busy" type error
> under Linux. However, on our CentOS4 servers running mount.cifs,
> accessing a
Hi there
I recall in times past that when a locked file on a Windows server was
accessed by smbfs, you received a kind of "text file busy" type error
under Linux. However, on our CentOS4 servers running mount.cifs,
accessing a locked file now only reports a "Permission denied"
Wireshark shows the
