next try - as i was not able to post the level 10 log as a mail (180kb)
i've put it here: http://www.mhcsoftware.de/smbprob.txt
the machine names are:
samba server: linux
windows ME: norbert
perhaps some can suggest a solution ...
TIA
matthias
--On Freitag, Juni 18, 2004 08:01:45 -0400 Jason
That look like your nmbd. What about the log.norbert file and the
log.smbd. Try tail -n 500 filename, for each that will output the last
500 lines of the file. You don't keep your log level at 10 do you? If
you have a busy server this will peg your CPU.
Jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
next
Hello,
check out, if you have a group, who has more members then users on the
system.
matze
Jason C. Waters schrieb:
That look like your nmbd. What about the log.norbert file and the
log.smbd. Try tail -n 500 filename, for each that will output the
last 500 lines of the file. You don't
a unix group? a group with members where the users do not exist ?
--On Sonntag, Juni 20, 2004 18:52:24 +0200 Matthias Spork
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hello,
|
| check out, if you have a group, who has more members then users on the
| system.
|
| matze
|
| Jason C. Waters schrieb:
|
| That
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
a unix group? a group with members where the users do not exist ?
Jep. I had this Problem in our LDAP-Tree. Every time I added a
domain-group to a local windows-group
Samba gets up to 99%. I heard, this Bug is solved in Samba 305.
matze
--On Sonntag, Juni 20, 2004
i've checked this, as there are only 2 users on the machine and only one of
them uses windows it was not too difficult :-) all users in /etc/group do
exist in /etc/passwd
--On Sonntag, Juni 20, 2004 19:39:45 +0200 Matthias Spork
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
|
| a
you are right ... as log.norber is quite large i've placed it here:
http://www.mhcsoftware.de/log.norbert.txt
log.smbd is mutch shorter:
[2004/06/20 19:44:02, 6] param/loadparm.c:lp_file_list_changed(2661)
lp_file_list_changed()
file /etc/samba/dhcp.conf - /etc/samba/dhcp.conf last mod_time:
so here we go, atatched (gziped - i tougt that it would be no good idea to
paste 180KB here) there is the level 10 log. the machine names are:
samba server: linux
windows ME: norbert
perhaps some can suggest a solution ...
TIA
matthias
--On Freitag, Juni 18, 2004 08:01:45 -0400 Jason C. Waters
Set your log level to 10 and then send us the log for smbd and the
machine name. Maybe that will tell us something.
Jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i've a problem with samba 3.0.2. there is one windows ME client which
used to work with out any problems. now, as soon as the user connects
hi,
i've a problem with samba 3.0.2. there is one windows ME client which used
to work with out any problems. now, as soon as the user connects
(sharelevel: user, or share - i've tried both) on smbd is forked which
causes 90 to 100% cpu load. when i stop samba (smbd/nmbd) this proces does
not
10 matches
Mail list logo
