Re: [Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-11 Thread Richard Foltyn
On 6/9/08, Sven Buchstaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the User Administration is over 1 LDAP Server. At the moment i become some errors on my first PDC box: I have the same setup, using 2 PDCs and one OpenLDAP server. However, for

Re: [Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-11 Thread Sven Buchstaller
HI Richard, THX for replay, thats not good news for me :( Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 12:56:33 schrieben Sie: On 6/9/08, Sven Buchstaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the User Administration is over 1 LDAP Server. At the moment i

Re: [Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-11 Thread John H Terpstra
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 05:56:33 Richard Foltyn wrote: On 6/9/08, Sven Buchstaller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the User Administration is over 1 LDAP Server. At the moment i become some errors on my first PDC box: I have the

[Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-09 Thread Sven Buchstaller
Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the User Administration is over 1 LDAP Server. At the moment i become some errors on my first PDC box: smbd[16074]: sid S-1-5-21-3194266148-564761370-2586249389-101652 does not belong to our domain(Thats all hosts from the

Re: [Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-09 Thread Sven Buchstaller
Hi Adam I have for DomA an BDC and work fine, but this is a second domain in an subnet for other users. MFG Sven Am Montag, 9. Juni 2008 15:14:17 schrieben Sie: why isn't one of the servers a BDC? Sven Buchstaller wrote: Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the

Re: [Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-09 Thread Adam Williams
why isn't one of the servers a BDC? Sven Buchstaller wrote: Hello List, I have 2 samba domain on 2 physical Servers but the User Administration is over 1 LDAP Server. At the moment i become some errors on my first PDC box: smbd[16074]: sid S-1-5-21-3194266148-564761370-2586249389-101652

Re: [Samba] second samba pdc

2008-06-09 Thread Adam Williams
they are different servers, hence the different SIDs. i'm not sure why you'd want to have 2 different servers with the same local SID if you're not doing a migration. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: