Hi all, when trying to mount a windows file share using the commands below,
mount exits immediately with message "password too long" before even
attempting the mount:
mount -t smbfs -o username="a user",password="12345678901234567"
"//server/share" "/mnt/target"
mount -t cifs -o user="a user",pas
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right group/list for this type of help, so I
appologize if it isn't, and ask if you can please direct me to the right
place.
I am trying to mount a NAS Samba share to my RHEL 4 machine to run backups
and am running into some slight issues / error msgs with it. I
Hi
I just installed FC8 on a desktop machine and have been trying to
connect to a Windows 2000 server using the following (as root):
mount -t cifs /// /mnt/ -o
username=*
However, after asking for password, it gave me the following error:
mount error 20 = Not a directory
Refer to the mount.
I am mounting directories from a WinXP SP2 machine to a Debian Linux
2.6.18-4-686 using /etc/fstab of:
//winxp/directory /mnt/mountpoint smbfs
username=xxx,password=xxx,uid=xxx,gid=xxx,errors=remount-ro 0 0
If I reboot the windows machine, any access to the mountpoint on the linux
box hangs
First I will apologize for posting my patch here if this is not the correct
place to post a patch.
I know that smbfs is being removed, but we still use it and need it to work.
We have a patch to contribute back to the smbfs in the 2.6 kernel. I have
noticed multiply posts on this issue and we
I mounted //winxp/linuxbu onto to a 2nd new mountpoint called
/mnt/buonwinxp. I got same errors as you.
So I first verified if password of the //winxp/linuxbu was wrong. With a
wrong password, I got response as below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# smbmount //winxp/linuxbu /mnt/buonwinxp -o
username
Rocky Zhou wrote:
local file system, it is OK , but when I mount the smbfs:
I'm assuming your doing this on Linux
smbfs is deprecated and has a 2GB filesize limit. Use cifs instead.
mount -t cifs //host/share /mnt/network -o username=
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fol
I wrote a python script wrapping find & tar to do full/diff/increment backup
for the system. For example, my configuration like this:
# cat /etc/new/fs_backup.config
fields = "identity, type, time, archive";
default = "full";
type = "${default}"; # comment
datadir = "/mnt/host/fs_backup/";
table =
All,
I am digging into an smbfs issue where we have a single server (RHES3 U3
kernel) mounting a
share from a Microsoft Cluster.
It happens once or twice each night around 8:40 and then around 10:40.
Doesnt seem to be related to any other services (backup etc).
Syslog shows:
Jan 28 20:3
On 2007/01/16 13:14 (GMT-0500) Gary Dale apparently typed:
> I've been using CIFS to access shares on an XP box and it works OK. Mind
> you, my requirements aren't all that great.
Timestamping is broken under certain conditions. You might want to test
and see if timestamps are preserved going bo
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2007/01/16 13:26 (GMT+0100) Prins, C. apparently typed:
In which samba file is the smbfs support located (I can install the common and
client file)?
smbfs is a kernel module. 2.6.18 & 2.6.19 kernels are built without
smbfs enabled. About the 2.6.20 kernel I don'
On 2007/01/16 13:26 (GMT+0100) Prins, C. apparently typed:
> In which samba file is the smbfs support located (I can install the common
> and client file)?
smbfs is a kernel module. 2.6.18 & 2.6.19 kernels are built without
smbfs enabled. About the 2.6.20 kernel I don't know, but smbfs support
m
Hallo,
Im trying to get the support for smbfs back in FC6_x86_64.
I've been told (correct me if I'm wrong) that the newest version of samba has
suppoort for smbs
I download the samba-3.0.23d from
http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Fedora/RPMS/i386/core/5/
But these are the files for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale wrote:
> There error you are getting could be because you
> don't have cifs installed. As for the ip address
> vs. hostname, just make sure the host is defined
> in /etc/hosts.
Just a note
According the kernel change log, cifs didn't g
I'm not sure is you can mount a VFAT share using cifs. Why don't you try
it? In Win98, share something then in your /etc/fstab, create an entry
with type as cifs.
smbfs is no longer maintained, so don't use it if you don't have to.
NOTE that smbfs is not part of Samba. You don't need to be run
Hello.
I'm using samba 3.0.22A and Linux 2.6.15.
I mount my shared Windows drives through /etc/fstab. The corresponding lines
are:
//raviv1/c /mnt/raviv1/c smbfs
uid=0,gid=0,username=x,password=x,iocharset=utf8,codepage=cp862 0 0
//raviv1/f /mnt/raviv1/f smbfs
uid=0,gid=0,username=x,pass
On Thursday 22 December 2005 06:36 pm, Dennis B. Hopp wrote:
> samba1 @ The Linux Revolution wrote:
> >Greetings, I'm hoping someone can help...
> >
> >I have a Slackware 10.2 server running Samba 3.0.20b. When I mount a
> > share with "mount -t smbfs -o username=user,pass=pass,fmask=777,dmask=777
samba1 @ The Linux Revolution wrote:
Greetings, I'm hoping someone can help...
I have a Slackware 10.2 server running Samba 3.0.20b. When I mount a share with
"mount -t smbfs -o username=user,pass=pass,fmask=777,dmask=777 //server/share
/mount/point" (on another 10.2 PC) the mount completes su
Greetings, I'm hoping someone can help...
I have a Slackware 10.2 server running Samba 3.0.20b. When I mount a share with
"mount -t smbfs -o username=user,pass=pass,fmask=777,dmask=777 //server/share
/mount/point" (on another 10.2 PC) the mount completes successfully.
Logged in as a user, I can
On 11/30/05, Eisenhut, Daniel (GE Healthcare)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the appropriate place to ask smbfs/cifs questions? I have a few
> questions that I'd like to ask...
For cifs, the mount.cifs manpage says to use the Linux CIFS Mailing
List, which is apparently located at
https://l
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:22 -0500, Josh Kelley wrote:
> I periodically see smbfs questions get asked on this list, and they
> usually get one of two responses:
>
> 1. smbfs is a kernel module; this list is not the appropriate place to
> be asking smbfs questions.
> 2. You should be using cifs ins
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:22 -0500, Josh Kelley wrote:
> I periodically see smbfs questions get asked on this list, and they
> usually get one of two responses:
>
> 1. smbfs is a kernel module; this list is not the appropriate place to
> be asking smbfs questions.
> 2. You should be using cifs inst
I periodically see smbfs questions get asked on this list, and they
usually get one of two responses:
1. smbfs is a kernel module; this list is not the appropriate place to
be asking smbfs questions.
2. You should be using cifs instead.
(Please let me know if either if these is incorrect.)
I was
I am attempting to connect to my suse 9.3 box from my windows machine using
swat. From the YaST system services(runlevel) screen when I try to enable
smbf. I get an error not configured. I can access swat form my browser, and
when I check status every thing is running but winbindd (I think that is
Hi,
I recently upgraded an older box running as a file server for a small
company to Mandriva (Mandrake) 10.1. It's running Samba 3.0.10.1, the
default Mandrake package.
We have a custom script that mounts a Windows share using smbfs, backs
up specific directories, and unmounts when it's don
I have samba 3.0.10 running on a Debian server. I have other Debian
machines which use smbfs (also 3.0.10) to mount the share. Every now
and again, the mount will lock and an ls inside it produces an i/o
error. If i try to umount the share, it gives me a share busy error.
Now, there is no real
I posted back in January about a huge performance gap I was seeing on a
gigabit network when comparing smbfs and smbclient operations. I was
advised to try CIFS, which I did. I didn't make much difference and I
gave up and switched to NFS.
Recently, however, I noticed something odd. If I move file
When I mount an smbfs file system from a Samba server, I am able to create
both symbolic and hard links in it with ln. However, while the hard links
are real hard links on the server, they do not appear as such on the client
because they have different inode numbers:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir mou
]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 1:46 PM
To: Rob Brenart (TT)
Cc: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Re: [Samba] smbfs pc-netlink problem
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:12:15PM -0600, Rob Brenart (TT) wrote:
> I posted basically this problem yesterday with no response, but I ha
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:12:15PM -0600, Rob Brenart (TT) wrote:
> I posted basically this problem yesterday with no response, but I have some
> new information so here's a rego.
>
> I mount a solaris box which is sharing files with pc-netlink
>
> I use the following line in my fstab
>
I posted basically this problem yesterday with no response, but I have some
new information so here's a rego.
I mount a solaris box which is sharing files with pc-netlink
I use the following line in my fstab
//machinename/Share /mnt/machinename/share smbfs
credentials=/etc/fstabpwds/username,r
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 02:34 -0500, Dyyryath wrote:
> I'm using Samba & smbfs to make directories on a Linux file server
> available across a switched Gigabit network. Unfortunately, when
> mounting the shares to another Linux system with smbfs, the performance
> is terrible.
I'm using Samba & smbfs to make directories on a Linux file server
available across a switched Gigabit network. Unfortunately, when
mounting the shares to another Linux system with smbfs, the performance
is terrible.
To test the setup, I created both a 100mb and 650mb file and transfe
The samba list deals only with Samba not smbfs. Other list members have
said in the past to people with queries like yours that there is a specific
list for smbfs/cifs.
Regards Geoff Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.
Hi,
I'm looking for a patch to the redhat 2.4 kernel to add Unicode
support to smbfs. My particular version is 2.4.26. I searched the list
archives and found someone named Urban Widmark claimed to have a patch
for 2.4.18, but his URL is outdated.
If anyone has this patch, please let me know -- th
I have a Debian (Unstable) workstation which accesses Samba shared directories
on a Mitel Server via smbfs mounts. All worked well up to an incuding kernel
2.6.7. After upgrading to 2.6.9 I found that trying to save a file to the share
in Open Office resulted in an input/output error. I found th
I have several smbfs mounts on different servers which I would like to
automatically reconnect to the share if ever the file server
shutsdown. Basically the problem I have is our snapAppliance NAS
takes roughly 10 minute to boot. 2 nights ago we had power failure
and UPS problems and all our serv
Whoops I should have run uname first. kernel is 2.6.7
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:55:47 -0500, Jason Pirok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry about forgetting that. My kernel version is 2.6.8
>
>
>
>
> > This might be coused by buggy kernel, I had sa similar problem with
> > kernel 2.6.1-...
> >
sorry about forgetting that. My kernel version is 2.6.8
> This might be coused by buggy kernel, I had sa similar problem with
> kernel 2.6.1-...
> which come with Fedora Core2 test1.
> When I upgrade the kernel it was OK.
> What kernel are you using
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
>The stranger part is, I can "preview" the contents with SMB4K or LAN://
> >but once it is mounted
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >Behalf Of
3.0.7-2 on Mandrake 10.1.
The stranger part is, I can "preview" the contents with SMB4K or LAN://
but once it is mounted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Pirok
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
drake 10.1.
The stranger part is, I can "preview" the contents with SMB4K or LAN://
but once it is mounted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Pirok
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
This problem began a couple months ago with my new install of (you
guessed it) XP sp2. Now, when i mount a share from the xp machine to
my debian box, everyone, including rot, gets a permission denied
trying to ls the dir.
I've read posts about switching to cifs, but that has opened a whole
new c
Bonjour,
Je réalise un montage samba entre un serveur linux et un client Windows
2000.
Je constate des problèmes d'accents.
Un fichier est créé sur windows avec ds accents, linux perd les accents
et vice versa.
ex1 fichier bé.txt créé sous linux, devient bU.txt le U majuscule
comportant un accent
Here's a curly one.
I have a share mounted via smbfs on my linux desktop. This share is on
a NetApp filer somewhere, but I've also tried this on a an old linux
server as well, and I have the same problem.
Basically, since day light savings came into effect here (NZDT or
+13), any file I create o
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 14:12:00 -0500
"Jake Brownson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may not be the place to talk about smbfs, but it's also possible this is a
> samba problem...
>
> Here's the situation, I mount a share on my Linux client from a Linux samba server,
> and it seems to work oka
This may not be the place to talk about smbfs, but it's also possible this is a samba
problem...
Here's the situation, I mount a share on my Linux client from a Linux samba server,
and it seems to work okay at
first... If I try and play a video from the share, it hangs after an unspecified ti
On Monday 27 September 2004 06:14, rich wrote:
> Dear JohnT and anyone else.
>
> Thanks for your msg. I left the list, and searched and searched. There
> doesn't seem to be a smbfs list (there's one on sourceforge...with a single
> ancient message in).
>
> Can anyone give any pointers? I wouldn't a
Rich,
You are using smbfs or cifsfs. This is the Samba mailing list - not the smbfs
or cifsfs list.
- John T.
On Thursday 23 September 2004 13:10, rich lott wrote:
> I'm using debian Sarge, Samba 3.0.6-3, Kernel 2.6.8
>
> I use smbmount //server/share mymountpt -oguest which connects fine, but
I'm using debian Sarge, Samba 3.0.6-3, Kernel 2.6.8
I use smbmount //server/share mymountpt -oguest which connects fine, but it
all dies (hangs) if I try to look in that mounted directory with konqueror in
kde OR nautillus in gnome.
In dmesg of the server computer I get:
smb_proc_readdir_long:
I earlier this week upgraded from Debian woody to sarge on a machine that
does a nightly backup to another machine via a samba share. Since then I
have had some issues with accessing that share with I believe are a result
of the upgrade. I upgraded the kernel at the same time to 2.4.27-1-686 #1
via
Hello,
I believe I have discovered a bug within smbfs that only shows up when the
remote filesystem contains millions of files.
When accessing a filesystem with a count in excess of 1.9 million files, I
have noticed that the files all exist, but when attempting to read them
results in a read of 0
Hello,
I have just started to use smbfs to mount some shares provided by one of
our servers for the purpose of
backup. When accessing some of the directories in these shares, the
process doing the access locks up. The commands: cp, ls and bash
autocompletion do it.
The directories in question
Hello,
Will smbmount be available for AIX 5.1 in the future?
Thank you,
Robert Gresky
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi Ralf,
did you manage to point out the responsible of this weirdness ? till now it's an
isolated case on our network...
thanks
> Hi,
>
> I've seen the same with SUN PC Netlink 2.0 (Solaris 9) as SMB Server. I'm
> able to mount a smbfs share on Linux, but the filesize is weird and it is
> impo
Hi,
I've seen the same with SUN PC Netlink 2.0 (Solaris 9) as SMB Server. I'm
able to mount a smbfs share on Linux, but the filesize is weird and it is
impossible to copy or to open. With Windoze everything works fine.
Regards,
> -Original Message-
>
> Hi team,
>
> i've got a behaviou
I'm running smbfs on a Debian box with kernel 2.4.24. I would give you
more information (such as my samba tools versions) if I could get into
the box, but it's hung right now due to this bug.
I'm mounting a filesystem from my desktop Windows box (which is right
next to it; there's a D-Link in the
Hi team,
i've got a behaviour that i can't explain at all
i'm running a Linux, debian unstable, samba packages version is 3.0.2a, kernel
versions are 2.4.22 / 2.6.1 and 2.6.4. FS is XFS.
when i mount a share on an HP-UX/ASU server, i can see files with their real
size, but when i try to copy the
Okay, I've posted this before but I've done more testing.
I am getting some seriously slow speeds on a server using smbfs (not Samba
Server). I'm using a Linux server and mounting Windows 2000 Server shares to
it. In my test, the W2K server is on the same local subnet with the Linux
server. I'm
i have one suse linux 8.2 (kernel 2.4.20-101) with samba 2.2.7a-72
there is an os/2 warp pc and a windows me pc in my home net.
i have the problem that i cannot see all files in some directories on
the os/2 pc. the windows me pc can see all files on the os/2 pc,
if i copy all files of such a direc
After installing kernel 2.6.0 on a samba client machine, the following
problem occurred:
The server:
One machine in the networks acts as a file server using samba 2.2.3.
(Debian-Woody). It exports one share to the network.
The directory structure below that share contains a few subdirectories
as
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&w=2&r=1&s=smbfs&q=b
--
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9
On 2003-11-29 at 14:25 +1100 Andrew Bartlett sent off:
If you cannot use smbclient (really, it is easier!), and you want to
patch your kernel, then patch it with the CIFS VFS:
http://www.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
However, in your case, you don't even need to go this far - with the 2.6
Hello, Andrew Bartlett,
Samstag, 29. November 2003, 04:25 you wrote:
AB> smbfs in the kernel cannot support the large files. smbmount in Samba
AB> 3.0 has the patches required to support the large file negotiation
AB> (that's the lfs option).
Ok, I see.
>> - I read about several patches and st
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 03:38, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hello, Samba-users,
>
> please don´t beat me, but I have to ask this question here, as I
> haven´t found an answer I can rely on until now.
>
> I am working on a solution for a backup-problem and one possible
> solution could be the use o
Hello, Samba-users,
please don´t beat me, but I have to ask this question here, as I
haven´t found an answer I can rely on until now.
I am working on a solution for a backup-problem and one possible
solution could be the use of smbfs/smbmount.
I am testing that now, mounting a WinXPHome(sorry, t
Hello,
I have a RedHat 9 system mounting a windows share from a Windows XP Home
machine that can't read new files put there sometimes, BUT, it can see
them - it just gets permission denied.
Here are some data points:
1. I mount the share with "smbmount" or "mount -t smbfs ..." and I pass
a u
We ran into a hanging smbfs now several times:
Client: Linux 2.4.18
Server: Solaris 8; running Samba 2.2.2
If the problem occurs we are not able to access or umount the filesystem any longer.
Is that a known bug I am not aware of or has anyone experienced something similar?
Thanks a lot,
Roman
I've been searching everywhere and just can't figure out how to change the
smbfs read size. Right now its defaulting to 4096 and I'd like to increase
it. If I use smbclient to the same server I get a read size of 65536 which
speeds my transfers up quite a bit.
I'm using kernel 2.4.18 and samba
I think I am experiencing a problem with samba 2.2.8 and kernel 2.4.20.
I am using these versions on a number of computers in a render farm. These
(Linux) computers use smbfs to access a Windows 2000 file server.
Two things that I notice:
1) The rendering application (Maya) fails due to a failu
Hi all, I have a question which we think has probably been asked before,
but I can't find any solutions. Bofore I get to the details, I'll give
some background.
I work at a university and we have a bundle of undergraduate and
postgraduate students. Our computer system is currently divided r
Hi,
I've been trying to get some database applications working on a mixed
Windows/Linux environment using Wine on the Linux end. A recent patch to
Wine finally implements the LockFile() and UnlockFile() functions, and
testing on pure Linux setups works fine.
However, Sharing from Windows and
is there a reason for this ?
and: is there a patch for 2.4.20 (i only found an old patch for 2.4.16)
The smbfs maintainer's page is at:
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/
2.4.18 patch applies fine to 2.4.20. Be sure to also apply
the patch to the samba sources and recompile smbmount. The
2
today lost some files (moving from samba share -> linux) :(
after some searches on the net i found there is no lfs support for smbfs
is there a reason for this ?
and: is there a patch for 2.4.20 (i only found an old patch for 2.4.16)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and re
On January 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Is there any work in progress to fix that problem? I'm running Linux
> 2.4.20 and SuSE 8.1 installed samba 2.2.5 but I've also played with
> samba-2.2-cvs as of today.
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ ver
[ I'm not on this list, so please include me on the replies! ]
Hi,
I've discovered (at least for me and some colleagues;-) the following
problem on Linux@x86 (2.4.*):
When we try to mount FS's via smbfs with the option uid= this
uid can only be 16bits wide:-( But we have uid's larger than 65536
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, [gb2312] li li wrote:
> Hi,
> I met a problem which had been discussed before, but
> I can't find the answer.
> I'm now using samba samba-2.2.7-1.i386.rpm.
smbfs doesn't support symbolic links. They are not part of the smb
protocol and are not supported by windows servers
Hi,
Please give me some infomantion.
Hi,
> I met a problem which had been discussed before,
> but
> I can't find the answer.
> I'm now using samba samba-2.2.7-1.i386.rpm.
>
>
> Following is the old list
> --
Hi,
I met a problem which had been discussed before, but
I can't find the answer.
I'm now using samba samba-2.2.7-1.i386.rpm.
Following is the old list
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:26:24 +0200 (CEST)
From
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, David Livingstone wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I am running samba-2.2.0a-0 on Suse 7.3 and attempting to use smbfs to mount a
>share on a
> dos 6.x system running, pctcp + nebios + powerlan
>
> When I attempt to mount the share ie in fstab
>
> //ARNLSPEC/E /wheelspec/ARNL smbf
Hello !
I am running samba-2.2.0a-0 on Suse 7.3 and attempting to use smbfs to mount a share
on a
dos 6.x system running, pctcp + nebios + powerlan
When I attempt to mount the share ie in fstab
//ARNLSPEC/E /wheelspec/ARNL smbfs
noauto,debug=10,ip=192.168.80.101,workgroup=WORKGROUP 0 0
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Kris Kelley wrote:
> When I discovered this was happening, I unmounted all SMBFS shares, and
> remounted them. This fixed the problem; all files created now have the
> correct timestamp.
smbfs sets the mtimes itself. Not really sure why it was done like that,
but some commen
Hello all.
Our system consists of two linux machines, each running Red Hat 7.1
(kernel 2.4.9-34), using SMB to mount multiple shares hosted by a
Windows 2000 Advance Server. smbclient from Samba 2.2.5 is used to do
the actual mounting.
Over the weekend, a number of files on these SMBFS shares we
Well, yes, I see your point about smbfs mounting the file system in single
user, but I see s many ways to quickly get around that
Assuming your passwords are stored in properly read protected files, why
could you not configure smbfs to mount the file system somewhere in the
users home dire
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Rashkae wrote:
> On a side note: I think a reason that your comments attracted so much
> critism is not because people think samba doesn't take corruption
> seriously (I'm a big fan of Samba and samba team myself,, and I think the
> level of support offered on the mailing list
doesn't always return all the files / smbfs
isn't asking in the way win2k wants.
Please try this patch for a 2.4.19 kernel:
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.19-rc1-ALL.patch.gz
If you are using NT4 I have one report of this change breaking listings vs
that, so I am interest
Hi
I have mounted W2K share to the Linux box (RH 7.0 kernel 2.2.19-7.0.16,
samba-2.2.5-1). Here is part of /etc/fstab:
//machine/share /u/smb/machinesmbfs
username=smbusername,workgroup=smbworkgroup,uid=675,fmask=440 0 0
If I do "ls |wc" in that mounted directory, then I get different
err=123
The server hates you.
This patch includes a change to findfirst/findnext, used to list
directories, to make them look almost the same as win2k:
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/smbfs-2.4.19-rc1-ALL.patch.gz
This is known to fix a problem with randomly missing files from win2
Mounted a smbfs filesystem from windows 2000 server. I am not able to list
about 1500 files in the mounted directory, the other directories are OK. The
error I've got:
smb_proc_readdir_long: name=, result=-2, rcls=1, err=123
Found no solution after searching maillist archives. System - RH7.3, 2
Fisrt thing, excuse me for replying with OE, I'm not @ my PC @ the moment
;-)
> ACL enabled network filesystem, where is it? I can't go with alpha code
nfs4,
> so is there a patch to the smb kernel modules that provides support to
ACLs?
> (I mean... the server does!!) Even a userland daemon will
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Edoardo Causarano wrote:
> ACL enabled network filesystem, where is it? I can't go with alpha code nfs4,
> so is there a patch to the smb kernel modules that provides support to ACLs?
> (I mean... the server does!!) Even a userland daemon will do... I'm ready to
> patch, t
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 01:55, you wrote:
> http://acl.bestbits.at ?
TNX, but I already did that server side. To get ACLs on a samba server you
either go XFS or get the patches you mention. This has saved my day when I
fulminated (he, he) an NT4 PDC (userland stood in awe @ the speed bum
http://acl.bestbits.at ?
Edoardo Causarano wrote:
>
> Hello there friends & foes,
>
> I've had if with M$ windows! Next week I'll sabotage my shop (how 'bout
> password protecting dualboots on WS) and force LINUX down my users' throats
> ;-) (oh, don't I like this tone... makes me fee
Hello there friends & foes,
I've had if with M$ windows! Next week I'll sabotage my shop (how 'bout
password protecting dualboots on WS) and force LINUX down my users' throats
;-) (oh, don't I like this tone... makes me feel Billy G.) Oops, showstopper!
ACL enabled network filesystem, where is
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Marcus Käll wrote:
> I use a Linux system with the Redhat 7.2 distribution. It runs on a
> AMD 500 K6-2 processor with a memory of 192MB. The kernel is an
> unmodified 2.4.9-31 from Redhat. I have tried both
> samba-2.2.4-1.i386.rpm from one of your samba mirrors as well as
>
Hi!
I have some problem with samba. The problem
concerns the smbfs kernel module and smbmount. Smbfs makes other processes
"hang". The only thing to do is to reboot the computer, not even "Kill -9"
works.
I use a Linux system with the
Redhat 7.2 distribution. It runs on a AMD 500 K6-2
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
> Linux version 2.4.18 (root@gere) (gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian
...
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c400
Apply this, or upgrade to 2.4.19-preX.
http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/00-smbfs-2.4.18-codepage.
Hi
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
rsync segfaulting and the kernel oops'ing while synchronizing two smbfs's
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I am implementing file synchronization between two Windows NT 4 machines
through two smbfs mounts. Rsync runs for about half an hour;
On 3 May 2002, Osma Ahvenlampi wrote:
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e000
> printing eip:
> e11f9af0
> *pde =
> Oops:
> CPU:0
> EIP:0010:[]Tainted: PF
> EFLAGS: 00010293
> eax: 040ef34c ebx: a2874a74 ecx: e8cd13fd edx: 9a6963dc
> e
Hello,
This is a bug I can easily repeat by mounting a share from a Win2k
Server, and running two recursive finds on it simultaneously. More
annoyingly, accessing the share with Nautilus can cause the crash very
quickly (with find, it takes a bit longer and needs a fairly large
share).. Sounds li
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
