On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:17 PM, charles wrote:
> From: Jeremy Allison
>> To: charles
>> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:27:03 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [Samba] ubuntu, ocfs2 with cman and ctdb
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
>> &g
>
> From: Jeremy Allison
> To: charles
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:27:03 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Samba] ubuntu, ocfs2 with cman and ctdb
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
> > hi guys,
> >
> > we're evaluating the available cluste
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
>> hi guys,
>>
>> we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running
>> for a highly available file server.
>> we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on sep
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011 02:27
An: charles
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] ubuntu, ocfs2 with cman and ctdb
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and
running
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:18:02PM -0600, charles wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running
> for a highly available file server.
> we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on seperate 2 node setups.
> ocfs2 seems to provide better throughpu
hi guys,
we're evaluating the available clustering options to get ctdb up and running
for a highly available file server.
we've set up both gluster and ocfs2 both on seperate 2 node setups.
ocfs2 seems to provide better throughput and iops to samba clients than does
gluster and that is comparing a
