Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread andy thomas
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: Hello, I'm trying to set up a samba server for a friend who has a mac. He's running OSX, version 10.2. He's got some really big video editing files that are well in excess of 2gb. We're trying to back these up to the samba server, but it quits

Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread Andrew Furey
We're trying to back these up to the samba server, but it quits right around 2gb. That seems to be a magical number. This is with version 2.2.3 of Samba, and Linux-Mandrake 8.2, ext3 file system. Well, the Linux ext3 filesystem itself has a maximum file size limit of 2 GB so that isn't really

Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You sure about that? I'm pretty sure I've had 2gb files on my ext3 drives, 2.4.x kernel. Bob On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:35:33 + (GMT), andy thomas wrote On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Bob Puff@NLE wrote: Hello, I'm trying to set up a samba server for a friend who has a mac. He's running OSX,

RE: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread David Brodbeck
-Original Message- From: Bob Puff@NLE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] You sure about that? I'm pretty sure I've had 2gb files on my ext3 drives, 2.4.x kernel. RedHat Linux 7.0 with all current RedHat bugfixes and glibc upgrades. Custom-compiled 2.4.17 kernel with ext2/ext3 ACL

RE: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread andy thomas
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, David Brodbeck wrote: -Original Message- From: Bob Puff@NLE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] You sure about that? I'm pretty sure I've had 2gb files on my ext3 drives, 2.4.x kernel. RedHat Linux 7.0 with all current RedHat bugfixes and glibc upgrades.

RE: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread David Brodbeck
-Original Message- From: andy thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] RedHat Linux 7.0 with all current RedHat bugfixes and glibc upgrades. Custom-compiled 2.4.17 kernel with ext2/ext3 ACL patches. On an ext2 partition: [root@bigbox /export]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test.temp

RE: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread Ronan Waide
For the record, stock RedHat 7.3 kernel (2.4.18-18.7.x) supports files greater than 2GB. Rather than debating the point as to whether various things theoretically support 2GB files or not, it's rather easy to empirically determine support using dd to create a file greater than 2GB. Just my $.02

Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just tried the example. Under a Mandrake 7.1 box running ext2, the file dies at 2gb. However, under Mandrake 8.2 and 9 with ext3, it DOES work (as in, there is no 2gb limit). So that being the case (that it's not the filesystem), why isn't Samba handling 2gb files? Bob andy thomas wrote:

Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread Cale Fairchild
I have seen the same 2 GB problem on my IRIX running 6.5.17 using an XFS file system. I backup my Windows box to our SGI server and the backup file is about 5.5GB when finished. This was working fine with samba 2.2.4 but as soon as I upgraded to 2.2.7 it stops the transfer at the 2GB limit

Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread jra
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:58:40PM -0500, Cale Fairchild wrote: I have seen the same 2 GB problem on my IRIX running 6.5.17 using an XFS file system. I backup my Windows box to our SGI server and the backup file is about 5.5GB when finished. This was working fine with samba 2.2.4 but as soon as

Re: [Samba] 2gb limit weird filenames

2002-12-10 Thread Herb Lewis
This has already been fixed in the CVS tree and will be in the next release (2.2.7a scheduled for later today). Cale Fairchild wrote: I have seen the same 2 GB problem on my IRIX running 6.5.17 using an XFS file system. I backup my Windows box to our SGI server and the backup file is about