Re: [Samba] An Interesting Issue in Samba Performance

2004-08-02 Thread L. Mark Stone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 30 July 2004 01:12 pm, Nicholas Butler wrote: | | A non site investigation showed that any file opened from the Server | , copied to the desktop client was being copied at super slow speeds, | as if all the bandwidth on the network had gone.

Re: [Samba] An Interesting Issue in Samba Performance

2004-07-30 Thread Holger Krull
Does anyone know of a test I could have carried out in order to trouble shoot that particular issue ? Taking Ethereal and looking for large gaps between pakets. Seeing a lot of connection reset by peer messages in the log. Always check for full/halfduplex settings of the network cards. -- To un

RE: [Samba] An Interesting Issue in Samba Performance

2004-07-30 Thread Jason Balicki
Nicholas Butler <> wrote: > A Client site of mine runs Samba 2.2.8a connecting to a series of > Windows XP boxes via a Netgear Switch/Hub. Budget constraints lead to me having to purchase Netgear managed switches (as opposed to something a little more traditionaly robust) a couple of years ago. T

RE: [Samba] An Interesting Issue in Samba Performance

2004-07-30 Thread David Brodbeck
> -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > When I used to work on problems like that for Vantive all I did was > put a sniffer on client and server and look for dropped packets. Once > I found one or more on a lan segment I knew there was an equipment > problem

Re: [Samba] An Interesting Issue in Samba Performance

2004-07-30 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 06:12:13PM +0100, Nicholas Butler wrote: > Okay Ive had a day of it today , and I thought I would share this little > support event experienced today. > > A Client site of mine runs Samba 2.2.8a connecting to a series of > Windows XP boxes via a Netgear Switch/Hub. > > E