-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Gienger wrote:
|
| Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Paul Gienger wrote:
|> |
|> | Just because someone doesn't search the archives, which
|> | by the way, doesn't have a search feature,
|
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Gienger wrote:
|
| Just because someone doesn't search the archives, which
| by the way, doesn't have a search feature,
For what's it's worth (from http://samba.org/samba/archives.html)
Note: Currently the Samb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Gienger wrote:
|
| Just because someone doesn't search the archives, which
| by the way, doesn't have a search feature,
For what's it's worth (from http://samba.org/samba/archives.html)
Note: Currently the Samba mailing list archives
--
I say:
--
First off, you are saying a lot that is "clearly false". LDAP can be used blindly in this case. All I needed is a way to avoid having winbind on system A from assigning UIDs on system B that is different. If the UIDs are not identical on all member unix servers
]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Fixed it myself... (ldap/winbind)
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 14:21, Josh Skains wrote:
> You said:
> --
> Your thoughts - rely upon an assumption that is clearly false...that
> ldap is usable without u
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 14:21, Josh Skains wrote:
> You said:
> --
> Your thoughts - rely upon an assumption that is clearly false...that
> ldap is usable without understanding it, that understanding it is
> digestible in some easy form and that documentation doesn't exist.
>
You said:
--
Your thoughts - rely upon an assumption that is clearly false...that
ldap is usable without understanding it, that understanding it is
digestible in some easy form and that documentation doesn't exist.
--
I say:
--
First off, you are saying a lot th
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 13:11, Josh Skains wrote:
> After much searching, research, compiling, and some guess work, I found my problem
> was wrapped around one simple fact. I didn't have the samba.schema included.
>
> I now have some suggestions:
>
> 1. If you are going to force people to use some
Josh Skains wrote:
1. If you are going to force people to use something complex, DOCUMENT it. Assume there are people like me who have no understanding of ldap. Even some automatic script should be written for people who need LDAP for distribution but plan to use LDAP for absolutely NOTHING else.
