-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Vizitiu, Ciprian wrote:
> Jun 30 16:17:39 server smbd[28856]: [2003/06/30 16:17:39, 0]
> lib/fault.c:fault_report(38)
> Jun 30 16:17:39 server smbd[28856]:
> ===
> Jun
Le lun 30/06/2003 à 08:38, Rashkae a écrit :
> For that matter, why would smbd (but not the system logs) be deleted in
> the first place?
on which FS type on does smbd reside ?
ext3. But it served files from a [Homes] on a ReiserFS
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
Le lun 30/06/2003 à 08:38, Rashkae a écrit :
> For that matter, why would smbd (but not the system logs) be deleted in
> the first place?
on which FS type on does smbd reside ?
>
> Jun 30 2:37am
>
>
> They hang the man and flog the woman
> That stea
For that matter, why would smbd (but not the system logs) be deleted in
the first place?
Jun 30 2:37am
They hang the man and flog the woman
That steal the goose from off the common,
But let the greater villain loose
That steals the common from the go
> > Signal 11, mmm, that could be a memory error(hardware).
> > Is the hardware certified? (www.memtest86.com)
>
:-D ... Well it's a IBM e-server. No, I didn't change the original memory
modules.
> If it was a hardware error; why would be smbd deleted?
Good question.
--
To unsubscribe from
Hi.
> Signal 11, mmm, that could be a memory error(hardware).
> Is the hardware certified? (www.memtest86.com)
If it was a hardware error; why would be smbd deleted?
--
Nejc Skoberne
Grajska 5
SI-5220 Tolmin
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL an
Signal 11, mmm, that could be a memory error(hardware).
Is the hardware certified? (www.memtest86.com)
HTH
Oliver
Vizitiu, Ciprian wrote:
Are you really shure, that the computer was breaked through
samba, you
can be sure only if just the samba ports (137,138,139,445)
was opened to
the Internet
> Are you really shure, that the computer was breaked through
> samba, you
> can be sure only if just the samba ports (137,138,139,445)
> was opened to
> the Internet?!
Yes, totally agree with you. Maybe my message was... No, for sure my message
was badly formulated. I had a RH8 machine with q
Vizitiu, Ciprian írta:
... By my mistake a 2.2.8a-1 running on RH8 was exposed to the Internet. It
was cracked in a matter of hours. I noticed it because they've deleted my
smbd. :-|
I'm ready to reinstall the machine, if there are any logs that anybody is
interested into please say it now.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:08:02PM +0200, Vizitiu, Ciprian wrote:
>
> ... By my mistake a 2.2.8a-1 running on RH8 was exposed to the Internet. It
> was cracked in a matter of hours. I noticed it because they've deleted my
> smbd. :-|
>
> I'm ready to reinstall the machine, if there are any logs
Hi.
> ... By my mistake a 2.2.8a-1 running on RH8 was exposed to the Internet. It
> was cracked in a matter of hours. I noticed it because they've deleted my
> smbd. :-|
2.2.8a cracked? Isn't this supposed to be the most stable release?
> I'm ready to reinstall the machine, if there are any log
11 matches
Mail list logo
