At first, has your file system already enabled xattr?
For example, are following commands successfull?
# touch test.txt
# setfattr -n user.test -v test test.txt
# setfattr -n security.test -v test2 test.txt
# getfattr -d test.txt
# getfattr -n security.test -d test.txt
And your
From: Dmitry Mordovin d.mordo...@dwide.com
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:39:44 +0400
Now, when I try to Apply hidden attribute, popup message - Error change
file attributes. Access Denied.
At first, has your file system already enabled xattr?
For example, are following commands successfull?
#
Added to global section
vfs objects = acl_xattr
No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
Have you tried using setfattr on that filesystem ? Does it work ?
Jeremy.
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:17:21PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
Added to global section
vfs objects = acl_xattr
No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
Have you tried using setfattr on that filesystem ? Does
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store Windows ACLs, need only DOS attrs (hidden file attr).
What Is enough to add to my smb.conf?
'store dos attributes (S) or 'map hidden (S)' or together or else?
I use:
store dos attributes = yes
map readonly = no
map system = no
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:36:51PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
On 12/09/2011 04:26 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
Samba config:
[global]
workgroup = HOME
security = share
max log size = 1024
store dos attributes = yes
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
Samba config:
[global]
workgroup = HOME
security = share
max log size = 1024
store dos attributes = yes
map archive = no
map read only = no
map hidden = no
map system = no
create mode = 777
directory mode = 777
On 12/09/2011 04:26 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:05 +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
[SNIP]
Samba config:
[global]
workgroup = HOME
security = share
max log size = 1024
store dos attributes = yes
map archive = no
map read only = no
map hidden = no
map system = no
create
From: Oliver Guerino oguer...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:29:44 -0300
What happened is the following:
My network has windows and linux clients, the permissions described above
operates normally with the windows client, but when I try to connect
with the linux client does not operates.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:26:10AM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Dear Jeremy and samba team ,
This is suresh from EMC.I am having samba 3.4.8 on my NAS with posix acls
support.
When a backup software backs up files and folders, it typically backs up the
security
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba
which got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:52:46PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks this helps.
Let me know if you really need the first version with ACL
support and I'll track it down.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:58:27PM -0500, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Hi jeremey , This is Suresh from EMC . what is minimum version of samba which
got ACL ( posix) support?. it looks to me samba 3.0.32 also got that ACL
support.
Can you please confirm on this?.
Oh yes, we've had
Thanks this helps.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Allison
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; j...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl
Thanks Smith. This explains in detail.
-Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Chris Smith [mailto:smb...@chrissmith.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:19 AM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user
...@chrissmith.org; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:40AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
source code
Did not get the response . bumping it. friends , Please help me on the below
issue.
Thanks
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of suresh.kanduk...@emc.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:13 AM
To:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
1) created share test given read and write access to the user admin and
read only access to user user1.
2) from my windows PC logged into the samba share test with admin user
. created subfolder in that test_subfolder.
3)
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Chris Smith smb...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Share level security will take precedence over
file level security when connected via the share.
Sorry about that: more accurate would be to state that the most
restrictive security permissions will be active. If share
-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:25 PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
source code prevent the changing setting rw access to test_subfolder user1
, since he has only read only access on the share test.
I suppose you could
PM
To: Kandukuru, Suresh
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba acl - able to change permissions that contradict
user security setting
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
source
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:04 PM, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
it looks like code is not designed like this.
if you don't mind , Can you please explain this ,
--
- although you would be asking
it to restrict the admin's rights, which wouldn't be proper behavior.
Plus it then
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:40AM -0400, suresh.kanduk...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks smith for the quick reply. what I want to know is ,can not samba
source code prevent the changing setting rw access to test_subfolder user1
, since he has only read only access on the share test.
The
All my fault. I forget to execute make clean before compiling samba
with ACL support.
--
Shaochun Wang(王绍春) scw...@ios.ac.cn
PH.D Candidate
State Key Laboratory of Computer Science,
Institute of Software,
Chinese Academy of Sciences
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
Harry Jede wrote:
Am Montag, 27. April 2009 15:33 schrieb David Vaz:
I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
with acl support.
The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it
in different machines.
In a given share, user A is the owner
Am Montag, 27. April 2009 15:33 schrieb David Vaz:
I am using samba 3.3.2-1 in a debian squeze installation, using ext3
with acl support.
The problem I am experiencing is easy to replicate as I have tried it
in different machines.
In a given share, user A is the owner of the folder test,
Is that the only option? We've noticed the same behavior of osx clients
recently, but we also have linux clients connecting and I don't wish to
degrade the experience by disabling unix extensions.
What is effect of disabling unix extensions? At least with it acls work
on OSX too.
--
Eero
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:19:19 James Peach wrote:
2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard
says access denied to every directory that is using acl.
2009/2/17 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
I have problem using samba+acl (ext3+acl) on OSX client.
Access rights works fine on Linux and Windows series, but OSX Leopard says
access denied to every directory that is using acl.
Is OSX cifs client too stripped that it cannot use acl or is
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17:10PM +0100, Keith Sudbury wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have a windows 2003 SBS handling domain logins, I also have an Ubuntu
machine being used as a file server this is using winbind and is on the
domain I can chown dirs etc with Active Directory users.
However I have
Hi, nix.
I have set up samba as a member of w2k the domain, has made Share with
ACL support. I distribute the rights through Windows ticks
sucsessfully. But I can not be remove them - windows says that You can
not remove the user because this object is inheriting permission from
his
Vadim Vatlin wrote:
Hi there.
I need help.
I installed samba + nt acl.
I switched on acl on the filesystem, added users in the /etc/passwd
and in the tdb database samba, using tdbedit.
When I logged in the share, I created a test file, clicked on the
right mouse button, chose
?
- Original Message -
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: H.Kitagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba ACL bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiro,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiro,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pub]# getfacl testfolder
# file: testfolder
# owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# group: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user::rwx
mask::rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
Any idea why the mask listed twice here. What file system is
this?
Hi Jerrry
- Original Message -
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: H.Kitagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba ACL bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiro,
[EMAIL
David,
I think you'll find this document helpful. I do not know for certain if the
permissions are the same on Linux, but it _should_ be.
http://docs.hp.com/en/B8725-90101/ch03s04.html
On 9/27/06, Graham, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I seem to have Samba+AD+ACL's working on a
Dear Guys,
I have noticed that one of our domain users folder in
/var/lib/samba/profiles has a '+' on the end of their username folder
and all the files in their profile too.
I know this is to do with ACL's and I know Samba can translate Windows
ACL's to filesystem acls, but where can I
Maybe this helps:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-May/105227.html
Greets,
Holger
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005 16:10 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm running Samba 3.0.14a on Debian Sarge,
The Samba server is member of a windows2000 Domain, named NT1
Problem that I have is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmmm. Silly SNAP systems do what I want (squash everyone if it is
- ---). Anyone know what modifications they make to Samba?
I'm using GuardianOS 3.0.099, and it seems to have some extended ACLs
that I don't recognize.
user::rwxdpo
user:admin:rwxdpo
Hi,
you got the same problem, many win admins have,
removing group everyone happens everywhere( in this group is everyone g
)in big windows hosting active dir companies, this makes their helpdesks
crazy *g.
Also deny permissions functions are simply a hoax by ms
I know windows book writers which
Marco Gavaldo schrieb:
I wish to realize a file-server with SAMBA integrated in my network domain
(Windows NT4 PDC).
To manage the user access for each share in the Samba file-server, I would
use Active Control Lists.
ACCESS Control Lists
Anyone can tell me
- what type and version of Linux is
Hi Marco,
Here's what I've learned over the past few days setting something
similar up:
1) The 2.6 series kernel supports ACLs on ext3, xfs and other
filing systems. 2.4 can support them if you install the bestbits
patches.
2) Samba 3 seems to work pretty well with ACLs, but
If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
2 using yum to update the kernel and it works fine.
yum?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-
From: Simon Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2004 14:09
To: Mark Lidstone
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba + ACL
If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
2 using yum to update the kernel and it works fine.
yum?
--
To unsubscribe from this list
Malte Woelky wrote:
Hallo,
Friday, July 2, 2004, 3:09:26 PM, you wrote:
If you're interested, my setup is Samba 3.0.4 on Fedora Core
2 using yum to update the kernel and it works fine.
SO yum?
Yellowdog Update Manager - Fedora update tool
Actually, that's 'Yellow dog Updater,
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 21:42, Hamish wrote:
Hello all
I am looking for a good backup solution for samba shares, I do not mean
to start a jihad between rival backup religions, but I would appreciate
any suggestions.
I have tried star and love it, unfortunately there does not seem to be a
I did not know that webmin had a module to backup files as well as ACLs
(all i could find was a dump module), could you give me a url to get the
module from pls?
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 21:42, Hamish wrote:
Hello all
I am looking for a good backup solution for samba shares,
Waider,
Would you mind commenting further on what you had to do to get RedHat 8.0
support ACLs.
Thanks
K.C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Waider,
Would you mind commenting further on what you had to do to get RedHat 8.0
support ACLs.
Thanks
K.C.
Sure:
* Download kernel SRPM
* Modify patches[1]
* Spend several hours rebuilding kernel packages
[1] is obviously the tricky bit. I'm
On December 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
fileutils, etc. I'm currently rebuilding various bits and pieces to
see if I can make it work without too much grief.
Okay,
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So it looks like the option is turned on in the kernel config, but the
patch is not actually in the kernel.
No, the option/s/ are all enabled in the kernel. What's missing, I
think, is all the rest of the support: libacl, libattr, patched
fileutils,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 19:14:01 +
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
bestbits.
xfs is a better choice and has the acl stuff built in.
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled
On December 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
enabled by default.
I installed RedHat 8.0 and acl on ext2/3 didn't work, with the precompiled
Kernel from SGI and xfs acl work fine.
Yup, this is why I said appear to have rather
On December 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
acls can work with ext2/ext3 but you have to apply the patches from
bestbits.
xfs is a better choice and has the acl stuff built in.
Actually, RedHat's recent precompiled kernels appear to have acls
enabled by default.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL
I'm not so sure about this... but looking at the changelog for Red Hat's
2.4.18-18.7.x kernel says (for RH 7.2) :
grep -B 2 -i acl kernel-2.4.spec
* Mon Aug 12 2002 Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ACLs removed for now because of stability and correctness problem
If you grep the config
56 matches
Mail list logo
