ncesMask"=hex:90,32,00,80
> "SmoothScroll"=dword:
>
> [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop\WindowMetrics]
> "BorderWidth"="0"
> "CaptionHeight"="-270"
> "CaptionWidth"="-270"
> "IconSpacing&
Martin,
None of these changes are necessary if the Samba 3.0.x server is correctly
configured. I have extensively documented Samba PDC configuration in my book
"Samba-3 by Example". This book can be obtained from:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample.pdf
PS: This is part of the off
Sorry, I haven't seen this
thanks for help
Nicola
John H Terpstra ha scritto:
>On Tuesday 12 July 2005 01:50, Nicola Murino wrote:
>
>
>>My clients are windows xp sp2, however there is the same function:
>>
>>Start->Run->gpedit.msc
>>LocalComputerPolicy -> ComputerConfiguration
>>Administrati
;IconSpacing"="-1125"
"IconTitleWrap"="1"
"IconVerticalspacing"="-1125"
"MenuHeight"="-240"
"MenuWidth"="-240"
"ScrollHeight"="-210"
"ScrollWidth"="-210"
"Shell
Hi Nicola (again :),
found what You were looking for:
Some information I found in the Unofficial Samba HowTo
(http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba.html) on XP Pro clients.
Extract from there follows:
## EXTRACT ##
Windows XP Clients
To force Windows XP Professional cl
Hi Nicola,
with WinNT, Win2k or WinXP I need to change some permissions.
Start on the client machines the Group Policy editor (gpedit.msc) and
try to find the switch "Don't check for permissions on profile".
I'am sorry but I don't own a Win32 machine right now.
Your problem is that the Window
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 01:50, Nicola Murino wrote:
> My clients are windows xp sp2, however there is the same function:
>
> Start->Run->gpedit.msc
> LocalComputerPolicy -> ComputerConfiguration
> AdministrativeTemplates -> System -> User Profile -> Do not check for
> user ownership of Roaming prof
My clients are windows xp sp2, however there is the same function:
Start->Run->gpedit.msc
LocalComputerPolicy -> ComputerConfiguration
AdministrativeTemplates -> System -> User Profile -> Do not check for
user ownership of Roaming profiles set to enable
now a basic PDC works :-),
thanks
Nicola
My clients are windows xp sp2, however there is the same function:
Start->Run->gpedit.msc
LocalComputerPolicy -> ComputerConfiguration
AdministrativeTemplates -> System -> User Profile -> Do not check for
user ownership of Roaming profiles set to enable
now a basic PDC works :-),
thanks
Nicola
a few notes:
when i browse from windows to PDC I can login to it using
Administrator:password or SMBNAME\Administrator:password
?
Thanks.
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
Hey Michael,
thanks for a quick response.
When i try to use BCHECKUP\Administrator it says "The parameter is
incorrect" and does not wo
Hey Michael,
thanks for a quick response.
When i try to use BCHECKUP\Administrator it says "The parameter is
incorrect" and does not work with ldap at all.
(BCHECKUP is my domain name)
I guess something wacky about my configs?
Thanks.
Michael Wray wrote:
Sounds like Samba SID doesn't match SID be
On 05.08.2003 16:21 Uhr, "Todd Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a small section of our networks smb.conf file. We are running
> 2.2.8a with NIS and I want samba to emulate a PDC. I have ran down the
> Unofficial HowTO on this but still come up with this problem. The
> smb.conf file sh
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 13:21, Todd Johnson wrote:
> This is a small section of our networks smb.conf file. We are running
> 2.2.8a with NIS and I want samba to emulate a PDC. I have ran down the
> Unofficial HowTO on this but still come up with this problem. The
> smb.conf file shows we want to u
Guten Tag Jay Winks,
JW> Is this the only way to solve that problem?
dunno, maybe you find a better one?
;P
actually its only the first settings
you do not need to activate "do not check for user ownership of roaming
profiles folders "
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Yannick Koechlin
mailto:[EM
Is this the only way to solve that problem?
VR
J
-Original Message-
From: Yannick Koechlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba pdc problem SOLVED
Guten Tag Yannick Koechlin, (oh, thats me!)
thanks to magnus
Guten Tag Yannick Koechlin, (oh, thats me!)
thanks to magnus:
http://nic.phys.ethz.ch/readme/45
---snip---
How to enable Windows XP to join the Samba Domain
The following steps have to be done with an administrator or a member of the
Administrators group.
This steps must be done befor joining t
MS> Congratulations, that you came this far.
MS> I have a swedish XP SP1(preinstalled from the factory). I can not
MS> even add the computer to my domain.
send me your config.
here is mine: (its a bit bloated...)
-- smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = ARTCORE
netbios name
Yannick Koechlin wrote:
Guten Tag samba samba,
i installed a fresh winxp sp1. did the signorseal patch
and added the machine to the domain with my root account.
Congratulations, that you came this far.
I have a swedish XP SP1(preinstalled from the factory). I can not
even add the computer to my d
On Sunday 10 November 2002 01:02, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> OK. Some details on Samba's internal request processing:
> [snip]
>
> This could happen for any number of reasons, but basically there isn't
> much Samba can do - the client closed the connection. You need to look
> at why the client has
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 17:45, Ray Simard wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply!
>
> On Saturday 09 November 2002 21:14, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >> ..
> > > The manifestation is, in nearly all cases, that the PDC sends a message
> > > to the workstation and waits for a response.
> >
> > This
Thank you very much for your reply!
On Saturday 09 November 2002 21:14, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> ..
> > The manifestation is, in nearly all cases, that the PDC sends a message
> > to the workstation and waits for a response.
>
> This protocol doesn't usually work like that. SMB is (for all cases
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 15:51, Ray Simard wrote:
> I've been beating my head against this one and just can't figure it out. I
> hope someone here may have an answer. The employees using the workstations on
> this network are getting increasingly upset with this problem.
>
> The problem is wildly v
22 matches
Mail list logo
