-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Jim O'Neill wrote:
> I have noticed the following behavior when testing out Samba 3.0.1 on
> RH9 with ldap authentication.
>
> Linux Samba V3.0.1 set up as PDC for domain DOM1 has a user test1. Two
> NT4 domains DOM2 and DOM3 also
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:31, Trey Nolen wrote:
>
> > you want ACLs on the server
> > you need a filesystem such as XFS that can support ACLs and
> > a samba compiled --with-acl-support
>
> Does anyone know if the Debian packages are compiled with ACL support? Is
> there a place where the compile
> you want ACLs on the server
> you need a filesystem such as XFS that can support ACLs and
> a samba compiled --with-acl-support
Does anyone know if the Debian packages are compiled with ACL support? Is
there a place where the compile options for the packages can be found?
Trey Nolen
--
To u
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 06:05, Bart wrote:
> Continuing on my previous inquiry,
>
> Windows 2000 has the possibility to set numerous permissions on
> a number of users, but in the linux ext2 file system I only have the
> possibility to set rwx permissions for owner, group and everybody else.
>
stions are welcome to overcome this problem.
Bart.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin@;lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Jay Ts
Sent: 23 octombrie 2002 15:42
To: Bart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Security issue
Bart wrote:
> My question is pr
Bart,
Check the permissions on the unix/linux file system. Since access is
determined by these permissions. You are probably the owner of the
filesystem and the other user is not in the group that was assigned when it
was created. Check the samba create mask setting in the smb.conf as well.
Reg
Bart wrote:
> My question is probable more a windows 2000 issue, but since my
> experience is that linux-related mailinglists result in more usable
> information, I give his a try.
That's correct, and maybe you should get a copy of Microsoft's Windows
2000 Resource Kit rather than asking Win