Re: [Samba] Small bug with Samba 3.0.7's smbd process (or just a bad compilation)???

2004-10-12 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcello Melfi wrote: | Normally, when Samba is started, there should be one | smbd process and one nmbd process up and running. Then, | one additional smbd process is started for each share established | with a client pc. However, this is not the case

RE : [Samba] Small bug with Samba 3.0.7's smbd process (or just a bad compilation)???

2004-10-12 Thread Melfi . Marcello
Hi Jerry, Thanks for the explanation! I must point out though that it would be better if the smbd process that is taking care of the lpq cache was renamed so that it would not be confused with the other smbd process. Regards, Marcello -Message d'origine- De : Gerald (Jerry) Carter

RE: [Samba] Small bug with Samba 3.0.7's smbd process (or just a bad compilation)???

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Melfi
Hi James, Thanks for taking the time to reply! You are right about one smbd process listening and the other one handling a share being accessed by a client workstation (like a Windows XP machine). However, if no client workstation is connected to a share, there should be only one smbd process