Christian Huldt wrote:
OK, found this thread (I googled, I (thought I) checked the list prior
to posting, well, well...)
Just trying to get my head around this:
group-type 2: domain groups
group-type 4: local groups
group-type 5: builtin groups
Now, I checked well-known SIDs at http://suppo
OK, found this thread (I googled, I (thought I) checked the list prior
to posting, well, well...)
Ray Klassen skrev:
> looking at the slapd logging after a 'net rpc list groups' it
> locates 57 groups and then queries the sambaSIDList attribute on each
> one. (which I said earlier I wasn't set)
Well here's the deal and I haven't tested it live yet, but it should work
-samba queries the groups with a wildcard search against sambaSID.
-sambaSID was set to be indexed by 'eq' not 'sub'
-sambaSID cannot be indexed by 'sub' without an updated schema. I used
the one from the samba3 package I ju
well that is the weirdest thing
Just like the samba ldap request, it returns nothing
although if I look at the record using
ldapsearch -x -b ou=Groups,dc=thisdomain,dc=com '(&(cn=groupname*))
...the sambaSID attribute is there just like it should be, with the
right number and everything.
Would
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:16:06AM -0800, Ray Klassen wrote:
> One sanitized debug lo coming up. This is not using user manager for
> domains. This is with net rpc group list.
>
>
> > What you need to do is provide a debug level 10 log of smbd
> > trying to enumerate groups.
> >
> > Volker
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ray Klassen wrote:
> Ok. I installed LAM. It happily sees all groups etc. because it's
> accessing them directly through ldap. There doesn't seem to be a
> utility there to 'fix errors'
>
What I meant was to use LAM to correct the errors in LDAP yourself. Go
to tre
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:05:26AM -0800, Ray Klassen wrote:
> Ok. I installed LAM. It happily sees all groups etc. because it's
> accessing them directly through ldap. There doesn't seem to be a
> utility there to 'fix errors'
>
> It's when you access the information via samba (i.e. RPC) that you
Ok. I installed LAM. It happily sees all groups etc. because it's
accessing them directly through ldap. There doesn't seem to be a
utility there to 'fix errors'
It's when you access the information via samba (i.e. RPC) that you
can't get a group list. The list is the only information I've found
yo
Yes. Thanks. That's what I've been using. I just typed it in from a
failing memory, obviously. :)
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>> 3.0.34 is now installed. no change. 'net rpc list groups' returns
>> nothing, while 'net rpc group members ' returns the correct
>> data
>>
3.0.34 is now installed. no change. 'net rpc list groups' returns
nothing, while 'net rpc group members ' returns the correct
data
The correct syntax is 'net rpc group list' ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mai
> did smbldap-tools get upgraded along with samba? if not, you should update
> them separately.
>
> if so, you will have to delete and re-create the groups in order for them to
> be created correctly.
>
> Another workaround would be to delete the groups and use net rpc group to
> re-create them. Th
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Ray Klassen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Ray Klassen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:13:45AM -0800, Ray Klassen wrote:
> >>> I have a network of about 100+ users with a Samba 3.0.25
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Ray Klassen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:13:45AM -0800, Ray Klassen wrote:
>>> I have a network of about 100+ users with a Samba 3.0.25 server with
>>> an LDAP backend that I configured myself (with
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:13:45AM -0800, Ray Klassen wrote:
>> I have a network of about 100+ users with a Samba 3.0.25 server with
>> an LDAP backend that I configured myself (with some help). Recently I
>> have had to add about 300 more
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:13:45AM -0800, Ray Klassen wrote:
> I have a network of about 100+ users with a Samba 3.0.25 server with
> an LDAP backend that I configured myself (with some help). Recently I
> have had to add about 300 more users to my system and now I need to
> get a slightly less tec
I got a debug log going on the actual ldap query and it looks like its
looking for an attribute sambaSIDList but that attribute is set on
none of my groups. Any guesses as how I should populate that?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:23 AM, wrote:
> Currently ...
>
> passwd: files ldap
> shadow: files
net rpc group list -- returns nothing
net rpc group members domain\ users -- works fine!
>recheck your smbldap-tools/smbldap.conf
>there must be a typo inhere, or
>your smb.conf has a typo.
checked and rechecked!
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:23 AM, wrote:
> Currently ...
>
> passwd: files ldap
>
Currently ...
passwd: files ldap
shadow: files ldap
group: files ldap
yeah the unix end of things is perfectly happy with ldap
getent passwd | grep root gives me both the /etc/passwd and ldap entries
getent group |grep Domain\ Users gives me the ldap samba group
Group Mappings are just fine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Johnson wrote:
> I think something is broken in 23rc1 with LDAP as
> the backend. "testparm" did not reveal any issues with
> my config file, but all I get is hundreds of messages
> in the smbd.log file that it couldn't connect to
> the LDAP se
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:44:12AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
I've used User Manager with no issues from the prereleases of 3.0
through 3.0.6. I have a need to upgrade samba so I instal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:44:12AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
>> I've used User Manager with no issues from the prereleases of 3.0
>> through 3.0.6. I have a need to upgrade samba so I installed 3.0.22.
>> Now, User Manager
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:44:12AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> I've used User Manager with no issues from the prereleases of 3.0
> through 3.0.6. I have a need to upgrade samba so I installed 3.0.22.
> Now, User Manager complains that the "stub received bad data". Not much
> in the logs indi
there was a bug with pre and usrmgr.
please use a stable package
greez
Douglas Sterner wrote:
Using Suse ES9 SP2 with OpenLDAP backend with Samba 3.0.21pre I'm
getting the following error. "The stub received bad data Would you like
to administer another domain?" then User Manager closes when
We had the dame problem with the initial version of the mysql backend.
our problem was fixed by setting the default value's for
unkown_6 to 1260 and
logon_divs to 168
dunno if the ldap backend has simulair entries..
but it seems indeed that your ldap database is corrupt..
Good luck
Collen
Lou
This is somewhere a problem in you ldap database.
if possible , try removing the database and rebuild it step
by step. this way i resolved my "The stub received bad data" errors
Louis
>-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Namens Douglas Sterner
>
Dutton
>CC: samba@lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User Manager Tools and Automatic
>Profile creation
>
>Timothy Dutton wrote:
>
>>Hi all
>>
>>
>>
>>I have a problem when creating new users.
>>
>>
>>
>>If I create the users
Timothy Dutton wrote:
Hi all
I have a problem when creating new users.
If I create the users directly on my linux box i.e useradd and
smbpasswd -a the profiles directories are set up automatically for
me.
However if I try to use the NT4 user manager to create the new users, I have
to
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can I use "User Manager for Domains" (usrmgr.exe) in a samba 3.0 domain?
> When I tried to add a user with usrmgr I Received error "Access Denied" but the user
> was created in ldap and it was added as a memberUid in Domain Users group.
> Is "User Ma
28 matches
Mail list logo
