On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> > Check the code for nmbd. You will see that it is essential that nmbd
> > listens on all interfaces. That means it can reply to requests also. It
> > will NOT broadcast on interfaces that are excluded from the in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
> Well, yeah, my understanding of the manual page was that if I set bind
> interfaces only, then it'll only respond on those interfaces. So even if
> someone pokes at the dialup interface, they shouldn't get a re
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Check the code for nmbd. You will see that it is essential that nmbd
> listens on all interfaces. That means it can reply to requests also. It
> will NOT broadcast on interfaces that are excluded from the interfaces
> specification if "bind interfaces only
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Check that this says:
> >
> > interfaces = eth0 lo
> >
> > where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
> > find it's name run 'ifconfig -a'
>
> I'd realised that. I'm not exactly a n
On January 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Check that this says:
>
> interfaces = eth0 lo
>
> where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
> find it's name run 'ifconfig -a'
I'd realised that. I'm not exactly a newcomer to unix/samba :)
> What is the output of 'n
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> > Try adding to smb.conf [globals]:
> >
> > interfaces = eth0 loOB
Check that this says:
interfaces = eth0 lo
where lo is whatever the loopback interface is called on your system. To
find it's nam
On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> Try adding to smb.conf [globals]:
>
> interfaces = eth0 loOB
> bind interfaces only = Yes
Digging up this thread again:
the current redhat version of samba seems to disregard the setting of
'bind interfaces only', as I'm still getting occa
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:46:23AM +1100, Simeonidis, Steve wrote:
> "Steve" == Simeonidis, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Sorry Eric, I'm talking about Windows DOMAIN/WORKGROUPS One
Steve> interface will have a different Domain to the other
Steve> eg. eth0 Domain - Dom
Title: RE: [Samba] Using the right network interface
Sorry Eric, I'm talking about Windows DOMAIN/WORKGROUPS .
One interface will have a different Domain to the other .
eg.
eth0 Domain - DomainA
eth1 Domain - DomainB
I was just wondering if nmbd will work properly.
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:16:39PM +1100, Simeonidis, Steve wrote:
> "Steve" == Simeonidis, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Thanks for that, I'll give it a go! Will nmbd work
Steve> properly if one "interface" belongs to a different domain
Steve> than the other?
What k
Title: RE: [Samba] Using the right network interface
Thanks for that, I'll give it a go!
Will nmbd work properly if one "interface" belongs
to a different domain than the other?
Will it get mixed up?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Eric Boehm
To: Simeonidis, S
On December 11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Well, I thought I had "bind interfaces only = Yes" but it is commented
> out. I commented out the interfaces lines and restarted Samba. Now
Red Hat 7.3
samba-2.2.7-1.7.3
with the interfaces line, there's still a listener on the ppp0
interface (the one I d
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:19:12AM -0500, Boehm, Eric [NCRTP:C28D:EXCH] wrote:
> " Eric" == Boehm, Eric [NCRTP:C28D:EXCH] writes:
> "Steve" == Simeonidis, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve> What I'm really trying to do and why I need this is because
Steve> I want to run 2 instances
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:52:31PM +1100, Simeonidis, Steve wrote:
> "Steve" == Simeonidis, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> I've tried the bind interfaces only = yes but still the
Steve> same netstat gives the same results.
Hmmm. That's odd. Maybe we need to see the rest of y
Title: RE: [Samba] Using the right network interface
I've tried the bind interfaces only = yes but still the same
netstat gives the same results.
What I'm really trying to do and why I need this is because
I want to run 2 instances of SAMBA, a different one on each interfa
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:55:49PM +0100, Holger Krull wrote:
> "Holger" == Holger Krull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You will want to include the loopback interfaces
>>
>> Check the sections in "man smb.conf" regarding these two
>> directives. You need to include the loopb
You will want to include the loopback interfaces
Check the sections in "man smb.conf" regarding these two
directives. You need to include the loopback interface in the
interfaces list or smbpasswd and swat will not work.
Hi,
are you sure about the loopback interface?
I have
interfaces eth0:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:25:07AM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote:
> "Joel" == Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joel> Just having a senior moment here, but, I recall vaguely that
Joel> samba will listening on all NIC's but ignores the ones you
Joel> tell it to ignore with.
Yes, s
On December 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Just having a senior moment here, but, I recall vaguely that samba will
> listening on all NIC's but ignores the ones you tell it to ignore with.
>
> Joel
Hmm. My home network config has samba configured to only listen on the
internal network, but nmb see
Just having a senior moment here, but, I recall vaguely that samba will
listening on all NIC's but ignores the ones you tell it to ignore with.
Joel
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:44:02PM +1100, Simeonidis, Steve wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> samba 2.2.5
> The server I'm using has 2 interfaces so using
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Simeonidis, Steve wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> samba 2.2.5
> The server I'm using has 2 interfaces so using the
> interface parameter I'm telling samba to use eth0 but
> for some reason when I do netstat it is listening on eth1
>
> interface = eth0 (the IP is 192.168.6.10)
Try a
21 matches
Mail list logo
