On Thu, 16 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf) Samba 2.2.4 PDC and fileserver
> built with --with-ldapsam. The clients are either win9x or WinY2k.
> Authenitcation, etc... all works great.
>
> But print sharing is a real pain. Under 2.2.1a printing
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Adam Williams wrote:
> I understand (pretty much) what "disable spoolss" and "use client
> driver" does but what is the behaviour of the no/yes configuration.
> It seems that "use client driver=yes" implies "disable spoolss=no"
No. This is incorrect. "use client driver
ms; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Samba] WinY2k Access Denied on Printing
>
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Fabiano Mucillo - func wrote:
>
> > > I understand (pretty much) what "disable spoolss" and
> "use client driver"
> > > does but what is th
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Fabiano Mucillo - func wrote:
> > I understand (pretty much) what "disable spoolss" and "use client driver"
> > does but what is the behaviour of the no/yes configuration. It seems that
> > "use client driver=yes" implies "disable spoolss=no"
>
> I don't think so. I underst
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Adam Williams wrote:
> Does this mean that every print driver must be installed on every machine
> (for every user)?
Yes, on it NT box. I didn't see the session [print$] in your smb.conf.
If you have it working you can use "use client driver = no" (default).
But, if you don'
>>1. UNIX printing works flawlessly (this box is an lpd server for lots of
>>unix clients).
>>2. Samba printing from both Win9x and WinY2k worked flawlessly under
>>2.2.1a, for a long time.
>>3. Printing does work, but only for awhile. And ONLY WinY2k clients are
>>effected, Win9x clients continue
I having the same problem with a couple of W2K boxes on our network.
The user could print for a bit, then get access denied messages. If we stopped
and restarted the Samba daemons the user was able to print again - for a while.
Sometimes removing and re-adding the printer would work
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Adam Williams wrote:
> 1. UNIX printing works flawlessly (this box is an lpd server for lots of
> unix clients).
> 2. Samba printing from both Win9x and WinY2k worked flawlessly under
> 2.2.1a, for a long time.
> 3. Printing does work, but only for awhile. And ONLY WinY2k cli
Adam,
Just one more thing, and I'll go away,
I promise! ;-)
If you set "disable spoolss=no", then install
all of the printer drivers you can, and
set "disable spoolss=yes", you should be able
to install the printers as Network Printers,
(not Local, as I mentioned in the last post)
connected t
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: Van Sickler, Jim
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Samba] WinY2k Access Denied on Printing
>
>
> >>>I assume this sentence:
>
>What is your printer admin set to ??
printer admin = @cis @users
where cis is the CIS department and users is just about everyone. This
used to be set to just @cis and it worked fine under 2.2.1a (cis has print
admin, no one else did). But when we tried to upgrade to 2.2.3a we added
@use
er, Jim
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] WinY2k Access Denied on Printing
>>>I assume this sentence:
>>>re-add they can't print for a little while before
>>>really should be: re-add they can print for a little while before
>>Yes.
>>>This sounds
>>>I assume this sentence:
>>>re-add they can't print for a little while before
>>>really should be: re-add they can print for a little while before
>>Yes.
>>>This sounds like authentication (how would I know).
>>This identical config worked without this problem under Samba
>>2.2.1a. If it was
Don't forget to restart your lpd & samba services
before testing it...
Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 5:06 AM
> To: Joel Hammer
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Samba] WinY2k Access Denied on Printing
>
>
> >I assume this sentence:
> >re-add
>I assume this sentence:
>re-add they can't print for a little while before
>really should be: re-add they can print for a little while before
Yes.
>This sounds like authentication (how would I know).
This identical config worked without this problem under Samba 2.2.1a. If
it was authenitcati
I assume this sentence:
re-add they can't print for a little while before
really should be:
re-add they can print for a little while before
This sounds like authentication (how would I know).
Have you tried easing up on the security, making the print share guest ok =yes.
Joel
On Thu, May 16,
17 matches
Mail list logo
