And the correct answer is...
Using a valid users line that looks like this:
Valid users = +DOMAIN\group
Many thanks to irda on the #samba IRC channel.
Ben
Ben Vaughan
Globalcom IT Infrastructure Support Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
312 673 4116
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are welcome :-)
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:51 -0600, Ben Vaughan wrote:
And the correct answer is...
Using a valid users line that looks like this:
Valid users = +DOMAIN\group
Many thanks to irda on the #samba IRC channel.
Ben
Ben Vaughan
Globalcom IT Infrastructure Support
On Jan 18, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
The nest group functionality is for a local BUILTIN\Administrators
or MACHINE\localgrp type of group. The patch in question I was
referring to was to expand local group membership in getgrnam().
These are different things. Not sure
so that anyone that is a member of one of the 4 groups should be able
to create new files in the /data/workpapers directory.
Getent group shows members of all groups, except the workpaper admins
group
You'll find that getent group doesn't list users within nested
groups, but Samba should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you have a valid users line? It may override write list.
I'd recommend:
valid users = bob, @GILMAN+techs
read only = yes
write list = @GILMAN+techs
(There is also a param: read list or some such)
- -Tom
Mark Carrara wrote:
| Yes getent group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does the command getent group work?
You should see the group as a unix group with members.
- -Tom
Mark Carrara wrote:
| I am using Samba ver 2.2.8 as a domain member server. I am using
| Winbind for user authorization. I have my home shares
Hi!
Actually I had a similar situation and was using winbind, which showed up to be
unreliable and _very_ moody. Recently, I've decided to give up winbind and move to NIS
and I'm really happy with it - no problems with groups, delicate wb's tdb files and
other stuff.
For further info read
