On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:12:54AM -0600, Jim Young wrote:
Hello,
Recently, the following problem started happening with a particular samba
server:
If i have a file open for reading (say, a pdf in xpdf) and then try to write
to it (say, through recompiling a latex document) it complains
Thanks for the info. I am using the smbfs debian package, but mount tells me
that type is cifs
//nsh/jyoung on /mnt/uni type cifs (rw,mand)
I have updated my fstab:
//nsh/jyoung/mnt/unicifs
credentials=/myfolder/credentials,gid=jyoung,uid=jyoung,auto,rw
0 0
and remounted, same
Hallo, Jeremy,
Du (jra) meintest am 10.04.08:
smbfs is going out of support soon. You should be using cifsfs
instead.
Maybe cifs doesn't work with Windows9x Clients.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Jim Young:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the info. I am using the smbfs debian package, but mount tells me
that type is cifs
//nsh/jyoung on /mnt/uni type cifs (rw,mand)
I have updated my fstab:
//nsh/jyoung/mnt/unicifs
Thank you for the reply,
# modinfo cifs
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-686/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko
version:1.52
description:VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS
Specification e.g. Samba and Windows
license:GPL
author: Steve French [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thx for your help.
Another question :
What does this exactly means :
vfs object = recycle:recycle
recycle:repository = .deleted
recycle:keeptree = Yes
recycle:touch = Yes
recycle:versions = Yes
?
Max
Liz Ackerman wrote:
Maxime, you are still not
as present which really aren't?
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate Tool Ltd.
http://www.wmptl.com/
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 7:47 PM
To: Nathan Vidican
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba
Is there any utility to manually manipulate the db file these locks are
stored in; or will simply deleting the db file after stopping all samba
processes, allow the new instance to create a fresh (empty) database? - How
do we remove the locks marked as present which really aren't?
Why would you
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:53 AM
To: Nathan Vidican
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] File locks db (manually removing locks)
Is there any utility to manually manipulate the db file these locks are
stored in; or will simply deleting the db file
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 08:11:59AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Okay, but then if the process signals back that is in fact not there, why
then do the locks remain?
No, the smbd process that detected the problem should then remove that entry.
I killed all smbd processes last night, and
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 07:53:32AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote:
After killing an smbd process, or occasionally after a process has died
itself, there remains a lock as indicated in an smbstatus output.
The process ID tied to the file lock in the db is no longer active, yet the
db entry still
Hi Rasjid,Jeremy,
We have the same problem as Rasjid said,
But I'm working with an XFS and ACL's on files and dir (samba 3.0.4).
I noticed that when a locked file (for samba) should NOT be locked, there was a
problem of wrong autorizations on this file. --x missing or something similar
according
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:18:08PM +1000, Rasjid Wilcox wrote:
We have the occasional problem that file locks are not always being
released. The result is files that insist on being 'read only' (claiming
that the file is already 'in use') or that cannot be deleted or replaced.
The problem
I suggest you get the latest samba version.
I've been having similar problems with older versions, wich I solved
disabling kernel oplocks:
kernel oplocks = no
If that doesn't solve your problem, try also
level2 oplocks = no
oplocks = no
(note that this will reduce the performance since clients
14 matches
Mail list logo
