Re: [Samba] User list

2005-10-07 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John H Terpstra wrote: > I helped Scott with his set up originally. The version of nss_ldap I pointed > Scott at has a bug that is fixed in later release. It causes the exact > symptoms he reported. I have had to update to nss_ldap 242 in a number o

Re: [Samba] User list

2005-10-07 Thread Scott Mayo
John H Terpstra wrote: On Friday 07 October 2005 12:47, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: John H Terpstra wrote: On Friday 07 October 2005 07:32, Scott Mayo wrote: I have a samba server setup with LDAP. Before I was using LDAP, I could get a list of users and groups with my perl script by using

Re: [Samba] User list

2005-10-07 Thread John H Terpstra
On Friday 07 October 2005 12:47, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > John H Terpstra wrote: > > On Friday 07 October 2005 07:32, Scott Mayo wrote: > >> I have a samba server setup with LDAP. Before I was using LDAP, I could > >> get a list of users and groups with my perl script by using the getgrent >

Re: [Samba] User list

2005-10-07 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John H Terpstra wrote: > On Friday 07 October 2005 07:32, Scott Mayo wrote: >> I have a samba server setup with LDAP. Before I was using LDAP, I could >> get a list of users and groups with my perl script by using the getgrent >> and getpwent routines

Re: [Samba] User list

2005-10-07 Thread John H Terpstra
On Friday 07 October 2005 07:32, Scott Mayo wrote: > I have a samba server setup with LDAP. Before I was using LDAP, I could > get a list of users and groups with my perl script by using the getgrent > and getpwent routines. I cannot use this anymore, because for some > reason, these routines do

Re: [Samba] user list

2003-02-25 Thread John H Terpstra
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, [ISO-8859-2] Máté Zoltán wrote: > hello! > > windows 95/98 client can't get domain user list from samba 2.2.7a > i would need it, because I dont want to allow some domain users accesing > a shared directory on windows 98 > > this is a feature or bug? Most likely a bug in your